Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26136815›Full record

ArticleAlgorithms for molecular biology : AMB2015

Detecting conserved protein complexes using a dividing-and-matching algorithm and unequally lenient criteria for network comparison.

Wei Peng, Jianxin Wang, Fangxiang Wu, Pan Yi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Wei PengThe School of Information Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan People's Republic of China ; The Faculty of Information Engineering and Automation, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, 650093 Yunnan People's Republic of China.
Jianxin WangThe School of Information Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan People's Republic of China.
Fangxiang WuDivision of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A9 Canada.
Pan YiDepartment of Computer Science, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30302-4110 USA.
Central South University · CNGeorgia State University · USKunming University of Science and Technology · CNUniversity of Saskatchewan · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increase of protein-protein interaction (PPI) data of different species makes it possible to identify common subnetworks (conserved protein complexes) across species via local alignment of their PPI networks, which benefits us to study biological evolution. Local alignment algorithms compare PPI network of different species at both protein sequence and network structure levels. For computational and biological reasons, it is hard to find common subnetworks with strict similar topology from two input PPI networks. Consequently some methods introduce less strict criteria for topological similarity. However those methods fail to consider the differences of the two input networks and adopt equally lenient criteria on them. In this work, a new dividing-and-matching-based method, namely UEDAMAlign is proposed to detect conserved protein complexes. This method firstly uses known protein complexes or computational methods to divide one of the two input PPI networks into subnetworks and then maps the proteins in these subnetworks to the other PPI network to get their homologous proteins. After that, UEDAMAlign conducts unequally lenient criteria on the two input networks to find common connected components from the proteins in the subnetworks and their homologous proteins in the other network. We carry out network alignments between S. cerevisiae and D. melanogaster, H. sapiens and D. melanogaster, respectively. Comparisons are made between other six existing methods and UEDAMAlign. The experimental results show that UEDAMAlign outperforms other existing methods in recovering conserved protein complexes that both match well with known protein complexes and have similar functions.

Indexed as

Conserved protein complexesLocal network alignmentNetwork alignmentPPI networks

Identifiers

PMID26136815
PMCPMC4487215
OpenAlexW1039758599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.