Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26136763›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2015

NPK macronutrients and microRNA homeostasis.

Franceli R Kulcheski, Régis Côrrea, Igor A Gomes, Júlio C de Lima, Rogerio Margis

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Regulation of miR319b-TargetedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The NovelPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  12. miRNAomic Approach to Plant Nitrogen Starvation.International journal of genomics · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Roles of Non-Coding RNAs in Response to Nitrogen Availability in Plants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Franceli R KulcheskiDepartamento de Biofísica, Laboratório de Genomas e Populações de Plantas, Centro de Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre Brazil.
Régis CôrreaDepartamento de Genética, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro Brazil.
Igor A GomesDepartamento de Genética, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro Brazil.
Júlio C de LimaLaboratório de Genética Molecular, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade de Passo Fundo, Passo Fundo Brazil.
Rogerio MargisDepartamento de Biofísica, Laboratório de Genomas e Populações de Plantas, Centro de Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BRUniversidade de Passo Fundo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macronutrients are essential elements for plant growth and development. In natural, non-cultivated systems, the availability of macronutrients is not a limiting factor of growth, due to fast recycling mechanisms. However, their availability might be an issue in modern agricultural practices, since soil has been frequently over exploited. From a crop management perspective, the nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) are three important limiting factors and therefore frequently added as fertilizers. NPK are among the nutrients that have been reported to alter post-embryonic root developmental processes and consequently, impairs crop yield. To cope with nutrients scarcity, plants have evolved several mechanisms involved in metabolic, physiological, and developmental adaptations. In this scenario, microRNAs (miRNAs) have emerged as additional key regulators of nutrients uptake and assimilation. Some studies have demonstrated the intrinsic relation between miRNAs and their targets, and how they can modulate plants to deal with the NPK availability. In this review, we focus on miRNAs and their regulation of targets involved in NPK metabolism. In general, NPK starvation is related with miRNAs that are involved in root-architectural changes and uptake activity modulation. We further show that several miRNAs were discovered to be involved in plant-microbe symbiosis during N and P uptake, and in this way we present a global view of some studies that were conducted in the last years. The integration of current knowledge about miRNA-NPK signaling may help future studies to focus in good candidates genes for the development of important tools for plant nutritional breeding.

Indexed as

microRNAsnitrogenphosphorusplant–microbe symbiosisplant nutritionpotassium

Identifiers

PMID26136763
PMCPMC4468412
OpenAlexW1601965834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.