Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26136758›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2015

Phosphoproteomics technologies and applications in plant biology research.

Jinna Li, Cecilia Silva-Sanchez, Tong Zhang, Sixue Chen, Haiying Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Phosphoprotein Profile of Rice (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Protein sumoylation and phosphorylation intersect in Arabidopsis signaling.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jinna LiCollege of Life Sciences, Heilongjiang University Harbin, China.
Cecilia Silva-SanchezProteomics and Mass Spectrometry, Interdisciplinary Center for Biotechnology Research, University of Florida Gainesville, FL, USA.
Tong ZhangPlant Molecular and Cellular Biology Program, Department of Biology, UF Genetics Institute, University of Florida Gainesville, FL, USA.
Sixue ChenCollege of Life Sciences, Heilongjiang University Harbin, China ; Proteomics and Mass Spectrometry, Interdisciplinary Center for Biotechnology Research, University of Florida Gainesville, FL, USA ; Plant Molecular and Cellular Biology Program, Department of Biology, UF Genetics Institute, University of Florida Gainesville, FL, USA.
Haiying LiCollege of Life Sciences, Heilongjiang University Harbin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein phosphorylation has long been recognized as an essential mechanism to regulate many important processes of plant life. However, studies on phosphorylation mediated signaling events in plants are challenged with low stoichiometry and dynamic nature of phosphorylated proteins. Significant advances in mass spectrometry based phosphoproteomics have taken place in recent decade, including phosphoprotein/phosphopeptide enrichment, detection and quantification, and phosphorylation site localization. This review describes a variety of separation and enrichment methods for phosphoproteins and phosphopeptides, the applications of technological innovations in plant phosphoproteomics, and highlights significant achievement of phosphoproteomics in the areas of plant signal transduction, growth and development.

Indexed as

enrichmentphosphoproteomicsphosphorylation site mappingplant biologyquantification

Identifiers

PMID26136758
PMCPMC4468387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.