Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26136711›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2015

Adjustment of speaker's referential expressions to an addressee's likely knowledge and link with theory of mind abilities.

Amélie M Achim, Marion Fossard, Sophie Couture, André Achim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Amélie M AchimDépartement de Psychiatrie et de Neurosciences, Université Laval, Québec, QC Canada ; Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Québec, Québec, QC Canada.
Marion FossardInstitut des Sciences du Langage et de la Communication, Université de Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel Switzerland.
Sophie CoutureCentre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Québec, Québec, QC Canada ; École de Psychologie, Université Laval, Québec, QC Canada.
André AchimDépartement de Psychologie, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, QC Canada.
Université du Québec à Montréal · CAInstitut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Québec · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To communicate cooperatively, speakers must determine what constitutes the common ground with their addressee and adapt their referential choices accordingly. Assessing another person's knowledge requires a social cognition ability termed theory of mind (ToM). This study relies on a novel referential communication task requiring probabilistic inferences of the knowledge already held by an addressee prior to the study. Forty participants were asked to present 10 movie characters and the addressee, who had the same characters in a random order, was asked to place them in order. ToM and other aspects of social cognition were also assessed. Participants used more information when presenting likely unknown than likely known movie characters. They particularly increased their use of physical descriptors, which most often accompanied movie-related information. Interestingly, a significant relationship emerged between our ToM test and the increased amount of information given for the likely unknown characters. These results suggest that speakers use ToM to infer their addressee's likely knowledge and accordingly adapt their referential expressions.

Indexed as

collaborationcommon groundegocentric biasinteractive taskmentalizingreferencetheory of mind

Identifiers

PMID26136711
PMCPMC4469820
OpenAlexW1481188462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.