Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26136412›Full record

ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2015

Evaluating potential biomarkers of cachexia and survival in skeletal muscle of upper gastrointestinal cancer patients.

Nathan A Stephens, Richard J E Skipworth, Iain J Gallagher, Carolyn A Greig, Denis C Guttridge, James A Ross, Kenneth C H Fearon

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03191955 (Biochemical and Functional Biomarkers of Cachexia in Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03191955 completednot on this map

Biochemical and Functional Biomarkers of Cachexia in Cancer Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of EdinburghRan2015 to 2025Enrolled282ConditionsCachexia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. A novel orthotopic mouse model replicates human lung cancer cachexia.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cachexia is Prevalent in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Associated With Worse Prognosis.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Biomarkers for Cancer Cachexia: A Mini Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  17. Mitophagy in tumorigenesis and metastasis.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nathan A StephensDepartment of Clinical and Surgical Sciences (Surgery), School of Clinical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK.
Richard J E SkipworthDepartment of Clinical and Surgical Sciences (Surgery), School of Clinical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK.
Iain J GallagherDepartment of Clinical and Surgical Sciences (Surgery), School of Clinical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK.
Carolyn A GreigDepartment of Clinical and Surgical Sciences (Surgery), School of Clinical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK.
Denis C GuttridgeDivision of Human Cancer Genetics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 410 W. 10th Ave., Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
James A RossDepartment of Clinical and Surgical Sciences (Surgery), School of Clinical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK.
Kenneth C H FearonDepartment of Clinical and Surgical Sciences (Surgery), School of Clinical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK.
Edinburgh Royal Infirmary · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn order to grow the potential therapeutic armamentarium in the cachexia domain of supportive oncology, there is a pressing need to develop suitable biomarkers and potential drug targets. This pilot study evaluated several potential candidate biomarkers in skeletal muscle biopsies from a cohort of upper gastrointestinal cancer (UGIC) patients.

methodsOne hundred seven patients (15 weight-stable healthy controls (HC) and 92 UGIC patients) were recruited. Mean (standard deviation) weight-loss of UGIC patients was 8.1 (9.3%). Cachexia was defined as weight-loss ≥5%. Rectus abdominis muscle was obtained at surgery and was analysed by western blotting or quantitative real-time-polymerase chain reaction. Candidate markers were selected according to previous literature and included Akt and phosphorylated Akt (pAkt, n = 52), forkhead box O transcription factors (n = 59), ubiquitin E3 ligases (n = 59, control of muscle anabolism/catabolism), BNIP3 and GABARAPL1 (n = 59, as markers of autophagy), myosin heavy-chain (MyHC, n = 54), dystrophin (n = 39), β-dystroglycan (n = 52), and β-sarcoglycan (n = 52, as markers of structural alteration in a muscle). Patients were followed up for an average of 1255 days (range 581-1955 days) or until death. Patients were grouped accordingly and analysed by (i) all cancer patients vs. HC; (ii) cachectic vs. non-cachectic cancer patients; and (iii) cancer patients surviving ≤1 vs. >1 year post operatively.

resultsCancer compared with HC patients had reduced mean (standard deviation) total Akt protein [0.49 (0.31) vs. 0.89 (0.17), P = 0.001], increased ratio of phosphorylated to total Akt [1.33 (1.04) vs. 0.32 (0.21), P = 0.002] and increased expression of GABARAPL1 [1.60 (0.76) vs. 1.10 (0.57), P = 0.024]. β-Dystroglycan levels were higher in cachectic compared with non-cachectic cancer patients [1.01 (0.16) vs. 0.87 (0.20), P = 0.007]. Survival was shortened in patients with low compared with high MyHC levels (median 316 vs. 1326 days, P = 0.023) and dystrophin levels (median 341 vs. 660 days, P = 0.008).

conclusionsThe present study has identified intramuscular protein level of β-dystroglycan as a potential biomarker of cancer cachexia. Changes in the structural elements of muscle (MyHC or dystrophin) appear to be survival biomarkers.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCachexiaCancerSkeletal muscleSurvival

Identifiers

PMID26136412
PMCPMC4435097
OpenAlexW1850779446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.