ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2015
Evaluating potential biomarkers of cachexia and survival in skeletal muscle of upper gastrointestinal cancer patients.
Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03191955 (Biochemical and Functional Biomarkers of Cachexia in Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Biochemical and Functional Biomarkers of Cachexia in Cancer Patients
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.
- The prognostic impact of pre-treatment cachexia in resectional surgery for oesophagogastric cancer: a meta-analysis and meta-regression.The British journal of surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Expression of genes in the skeletal muscle of individuals with cachexia/sarcopenia: A systematic review.PloS one · 2019Pooled it
- Pectoralis major muscle atrophy is associated with mitochondrial energy wasting in cachectic patients with gastrointestinal cancer.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2022Trial
- Cancer-Associated Cachexia: Bridging Clinical Findings with Mechanistic Insights in Human Studies.Cancer discovery · 2025Review
- Deciphering molecular crosstalk mechanisms between skeletal muscle atrophy and KRAS-mutant pancreatic cancer: a literature review.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2025Review
- Extracellular vesicles in cancer cachexia: deciphering pathogenic roles and exploring therapeutic horizons.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Review
- Skeletal muscle analysis of cancer patients reveals a potential role for carnosine in muscle wasting.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2023Article
- Molecular mechanisms of cancer cachexia-related loss of skeletal muscle mass: data analysis from preclinical and clinical studies.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2023Review
- A novel orthotopic mouse model replicates human lung cancer cachexia.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- PD-1 Alleviates Cisplatin-Induced Muscle Atrophy by Regulating Inflammation and Oxidative Stress.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Cachexia is Prevalent in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Associated With Worse Prognosis.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2022Article
- Tumor cell anabolism and host tissue catabolism-energetic inefficiency during cancer cachexia.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Tumor-derived IL-6 and trans-signaling among tumor, fat, and muscle mediate pancreatic cancer cachexia.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2021Article
- Biomarkers for Cancer Cachexia: A Mini Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Mitophagy in tumorigenesis and metastasis.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021Review
- Weight Loss in Cancer Patients Correlates With p38β MAPK Activation in Skeletal Muscle.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- Phosphorylation of Dynamin-Related Protein 1 (DRP1) Regulates Mitochondrial Dynamics and Skeletal Muscle Wasting in Cancer Cachexia.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- Cancer cachexia and skeletal muscle atrophy in clinical studies: what do we really know?Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn order to grow the potential therapeutic armamentarium in the cachexia domain of supportive oncology, there is a pressing need to develop suitable biomarkers and potential drug targets. This pilot study evaluated several potential candidate biomarkers in skeletal muscle biopsies from a cohort of upper gastrointestinal cancer (UGIC) patients.
methodsOne hundred seven patients (15 weight-stable healthy controls (HC) and 92 UGIC patients) were recruited. Mean (standard deviation) weight-loss of UGIC patients was 8.1 (9.3%). Cachexia was defined as weight-loss ≥5%. Rectus abdominis muscle was obtained at surgery and was analysed by western blotting or quantitative real-time-polymerase chain reaction. Candidate markers were selected according to previous literature and included Akt and phosphorylated Akt (pAkt, n = 52), forkhead box O transcription factors (n = 59), ubiquitin E3 ligases (n = 59, control of muscle anabolism/catabolism), BNIP3 and GABARAPL1 (n = 59, as markers of autophagy), myosin heavy-chain (MyHC, n = 54), dystrophin (n = 39), β-dystroglycan (n = 52), and β-sarcoglycan (n = 52, as markers of structural alteration in a muscle). Patients were followed up for an average of 1255 days (range 581-1955 days) or until death. Patients were grouped accordingly and analysed by (i) all cancer patients vs. HC; (ii) cachectic vs. non-cachectic cancer patients; and (iii) cancer patients surviving ≤1 vs. >1 year post operatively.
resultsCancer compared with HC patients had reduced mean (standard deviation) total Akt protein [0.49 (0.31) vs. 0.89 (0.17), P = 0.001], increased ratio of phosphorylated to total Akt [1.33 (1.04) vs. 0.32 (0.21), P = 0.002] and increased expression of GABARAPL1 [1.60 (0.76) vs. 1.10 (0.57), P = 0.024]. β-Dystroglycan levels were higher in cachectic compared with non-cachectic cancer patients [1.01 (0.16) vs. 0.87 (0.20), P = 0.007]. Survival was shortened in patients with low compared with high MyHC levels (median 316 vs. 1326 days, P = 0.023) and dystrophin levels (median 341 vs. 660 days, P = 0.008).
conclusionsThe present study has identified intramuscular protein level of β-dystroglycan as a potential biomarker of cancer cachexia. Changes in the structural elements of muscle (MyHC or dystrophin) appear to be survival biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.