Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26135861›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2015

Cohort Study of Airway Mycobiome in Adult Cystic Fibrosis Patients: Differences in Community Structure between Fungi and Bacteria Reveal Predominance of Transient Fungal Elements.

Rolf Kramer, Annette Sauer-Heilborn, Tobias Welte, Carlos A Guzman, Wolf-Rainer Abraham, Manfred G Höfle

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Fungal lung disease.The European respiratory journal · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Infection and the microbiome in bronchiectasis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Distinct community structures of the fungal microbiome and respiratory health in adults with cystic fibrosis.Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Lung Microbiome in Critically Ill Patients.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rolf KramerDepartment of Vaccinology and Applied Microbiology, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany Rolf.Kramer@up.ac.za.
Annette Sauer-HeilbornDepartment of Pneumology, Hanover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Tobias WelteDepartment of Pneumology, Hanover Medical School, Hannover, Germany German Centre for Infection Research and German Centre for Lung Research, Hannover, Germany.
Carlos A GuzmanDepartment of Vaccinology and Applied Microbiology, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany.
Wolf-Rainer AbrahamDepartment of Vaccinology and Applied Microbiology, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany.
Manfred G HöfleDepartment of Vaccinology and Applied Microbiology, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany.
Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The respiratory mycobiome is an important but understudied component of the human microbiota. Like bacteria, fungi can cause severe lung diseases, but their infection rates are much lower. This study compared the bacterial and fungal communities of sputum samples from a large cohort of 56 adult patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) during nonexacerbation periods and under continuous antibiotic treatment. Molecular fingerprinting based on single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis revealed fundamental differences between bacterial and fungal communities. Both groups of microorganisms were taxonomically classified by identification of gene sequences (16S rRNA and internal transcript spacer), and prevalences of single taxa were determined for the entire cohort. Major bacterial pathogens were frequently observed, whereas fungi of known pathogenicity in CF were detected only in low numbers. Fungal species richness increased without reaching a constant level (saturation), whereas bacterial richness showed saturation after 50 patients were analyzed. In contrast to bacteria, a large number of fungal species were observed together with high fluctuations over time and among patients. These findings demonstrated that the mycobiome was dominated by transient species, which strongly suggested that the main driving force was their presence in inhaled air rather than colonization. Considering the high exposure of human airways to fungal spores, we concluded that fungi have low colonization abilities in CF, and colonization by pathogenic fungal species may be considered a rare event. A comprehensive understanding of the conditions promoting fungal colonization may offer the opportunity to prevent colonization and substantially reduce or even eliminate fungus-related disease progression in CF.

Indexed as

BiotaAdolescentAdultBacteriaCohort StudiesCystic FibrosisDNA, BacterialDNA, FungalDNA, IntergenicDNA, RibosomalFemaleFungiHumansMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Sequence DataDNA, BacterialDNA, FungalDNA, IntergenicDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID26135861
PMCPMC4540938
OpenAlexW1803750729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.