Utility of the SYNTAX score in predicting outcomes after coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion.

backgroundChronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions are a challenging issue. When dealing with complex CTO lesions in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), it is important to evaluate not only the CTO lesion itself but also atherosclerotic lesions of the whole coronary artery tree. The utility of the SYNTAX (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery Trial) score in patients with CTO undergoing PCI is unclear.

methodsThis retrospective study included 304 consecutive patients with CTO lesions who underwent PCI. Primary endpoints were procedural failure and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) within 30 days. The SYNTAX and J-CTO (Multicenter CTO Registry in Japan) scores were assessed before the procedures, and patients were divided into two groups according to SYNTAX criteria: high (> 22; n = 158) and low (≤ 22; n = 146) SYNTAX scores.

resultsProcedural success was achieved in 252 patients (82.9 %). Patients with a high SYNTAX score had significantly lower procedural success than those with a low SYNTAX score (74.7 % versus 91.8 %, p < 0.0001). There were 13 MACE (8.2 %) in patients with high SYNTAX scores and two MACE (1.4 %) in those with low scores. The SYNTAX and J-CTO scores had odds ratios of 3.33 (95 %CI, 1.44-7.74) and 3.64 (95 %CI, 1.24-10.66) for procedural failure. A higher SYNTAX score (> 22) was also an independent predictor of 30-day MACE after PCI (odds ratio = 4.80, 95 %Cl 1.03-22.42).

conclusionThe SYNTAX score is predictive of procedural failure, as is the J-CTO score. Furthermore, a higher SYNTAX score is strongly associated with an increased risk of 30-day MACE. The SYNTAX score is useful for clinical decision making when treating patients with complex CTO lesions.