Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26135318›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2015

Population Pharmacokinetics of an Indian F(ab')2 Snake Antivenom in Patients with Russell's Viper (Daboia russelii) Bites.

Geoffrey K Isbister, Kalana Maduwage, Ana Saiao, Nicholas A Buckley, Shaluka F Jayamanne, Shahmy Seyed, Fahim Mohamed, Umesh Chathuranga, Alexandre Mendes, Chandana Abeysinghe and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cost of Manufacturing for Recombinant Snakebite Antivenoms.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Geoffrey K IsbisterClinical Toxicology Research Group, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia; South Asian Clinical Toxicology Research Collaboration (SACTRC), Faculty of Medicine, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.
Kalana MaduwageClinical Toxicology Research Group, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia; South Asian Clinical Toxicology Research Collaboration (SACTRC), Faculty of Medicine, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.
Ana SaiaoClinical Toxicology Research Group, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Nicholas A BuckleySouth Asian Clinical Toxicology Research Collaboration (SACTRC), Faculty of Medicine, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka; Clinical Pharmacology, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Shaluka F JayamanneSouth Asian Clinical Toxicology Research Collaboration (SACTRC), Faculty of Medicine, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Ragama, Sri Lanka.
Shahmy SeyedSouth Asian Clinical Toxicology Research Collaboration (SACTRC), Faculty of Medicine, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.
Fahim MohamedSouth Asian Clinical Toxicology Research Collaboration (SACTRC), Faculty of Medicine, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka; Clinical Pharmacology, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Umesh ChathurangaSouth Asian Clinical Toxicology Research Collaboration (SACTRC), Faculty of Medicine, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.
Alexandre MendesSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Chandana AbeysingheDistrict Hospital Hingurakgoda, Hingurakgoda, Sri Lanka.
Harindra KarunathilakeGeneral Hospital Matara, Matara, Sri Lanka.
Indika GawarammanaSouth Asian Clinical Toxicology Research Collaboration (SACTRC), Faculty of Medicine, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.
David G LallooClinical Sciences and International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
H Janaka de SilvaSouth Asian Clinical Toxicology Research Collaboration (SACTRC), Faculty of Medicine, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Ragama, Sri Lanka.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is limited information on antivenom pharmacokinetics. This study aimed to investigate the pharmacokinetics of an Indian snake antivenom in humans with Russell's viper bites. METHODS/PRINCIPAL

findingsPatient data and serial blood samples were collected from patients with Russell's viper (Daboia russelii) envenoming in Sri Lanka. All patients received Indian F(ab')2 snake antivenom manufactured by VINS Bioproducts Ltd. Antivenom concentrations were measured with sandwich enzyme immunoassays. Timed antivenom concentrations were analysed using MONOLIXvs4.2. One, two and three compartment models with zero order input and first order elimination kinetics were assessed. Models were parameterized with clearance (CL), intercompartmental clearance (Q), central compartment volume (V) and peripheral compartment volume (VP). Between-subject-variability (BSV) on relative bioavailability (F) was included to account for dose variations. Covariates effects (age, sex, weight, antivenom batch, pre-antivenom concentrations) were explored by visual inspection and in model building. There were 75 patients, median age 57 years (40-70 y) and 64 (85%) were male. 411 antivenom concentration data points were analysed. A two compartment model with zero order input, linear elimination kinetics and a combined error model best described the data. Inclusion of BSV on F and weight as a covariate on V improved the model. Inclusion of pre-antivenom concentrations or different batches on BSV of F did not. Final model parameter estimates were CL,0.078 L h(-1), V,2.2L, Q,0.178 L h(-1) and VP,8.33L. The median half-life of distribution was 4.6 h (10-90%iles:2.6-7.1 h) and half-life of elimination, 140 h (10th-90th percentilesx:95-223h).

conclusionIndian F(ab')2 snake antivenom displayed biexponential disposition pharmacokinetics, with a rapid distribution half-life and more prolonged elimination half-life.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnimalsAntiveninsDaboiaFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin Fab FragmentsKineticsMaleMiddle AgedSnake BitesSri LankaViper VenomsAntiveninsImmunoglobulin Fab FragmentsViper Venoms

Identifiers

PMID26135318
PMCPMC4489840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.