ArticleBMC medical ethics2015
Exploring researchers' experiences of working with a researcher-driven, population-specific community advisory board in a South African schizophrenia genomics study.
Article in BMC medical ethics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Informed consent in genetic and genomic studies in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of bioethical issues.BMC medical ethics · 2025Pooled it
- Patient and public involvement in health research in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2019Pooled it
- Consenting practices to enhance comprehension in research involving individuals with schizophrenia and bipolar affective disorder in Uganda: a qualitative inquiry.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Ethical challenges researchers encounter during the informed consent processes for research involving people with schizophrenia and bipolar affective disorder: a qualitative assessment.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Amplifying every echo; public partnerships in ongoing CONTROL (COgNitive Therapy for depRessiOn in tubercuLosis treatment) research study.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Article
- Emerging practice in mental health patient and public involvement research advisory groups: a narrative review.BMC psychiatry · 2025Review
- Research participants and stakeholders' views on feedback of genetic research findings: a qualitative study of the H3Africa Kidney Disease Research Network in Ghana.BMC nephrology · 2025Article
- Decolonisation and Self-Regulation as Alternative Paths to Data Science Health Research Governance in Africa.Wellcome open research · 2025Article
- Community engagement conduct for genetics and genomics research: a qualitative study of the experiences and perspectives of key stakeholders in Uganda.BMC medical ethics · 2024Article
- Using visual storytelling to share aggregate findings with families participating in clinical genomics research.Genetics in medicine open · 2024Article
- Unveiling readability challenges: An extensive analysis of consent document accessibility in clinical trials.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- Participant views on practical considerations for feedback of individual genetic research results: a case study from Botswana.Global bioethics = Problemi di bioetica · 2023Article
- "Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2022Article
- Addressing diversity and inclusion challenges in global neuro-psychiatric and behavioral genomics research.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Adaptation and validation of a computerized neurocognitive battery in the Xhosa of South Africa.Neuropsychology · 2021Article
- Co-developing a common glossary with stakeholders for engagement on new genetic approaches for malaria control in a local African setting.Malaria journal · 2021Article
- Evaluating Community Engagement Strategies to Manage Stigma in Two African Genomics Studies Involving People Living with Schizophrenia or Rheumatic Heart Disease.Global health, epidemiology and genomics · 2021Article
- Tygerberg Research Ubuntu-Inspired Community Engagement Model: Integrating Community Engagement into Genomic Biobanking.Biopreservation and biobanking · 2019Article
- Commentary 2: Remuneration for Community Advisory Board (CAB) Members: A Call for Remuneration Guidelines for CAB Members in Biomedical Research.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2019Article
- Engaging research ethics committees to develop an ethics and governance framework for best practices in genomic research and biobanking in Africa: the H3Africa model.BMC medical ethics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCommunity engagement within biomedical research is broadly defined as a collaborative relationship between a research team and a group of individuals targeted for research. A Community Advisory Board (CAB) is one mechanism of engaging the community. Within genomics research CABs may be particularly relevant due to the potential implications of research findings drawn from individual participants on the larger communities they represent. Within such research, CABs seek to meet instrumental goals such as protecting research participants and their community from research-related risks, as well as intrinsic goals such as promoting the respect of participants and their community. However, successful community engagement depends on the degree to which CABs legitimately represent and engage with communities targeted for research. Currently, there is little literature describing the use of CABs in genomics research taking place in developing countries, and even less in the field of genomics research relating to mental illness. The aim of this article is to describe and consider the contributions made by a researcher-driven, population-specific CAB in a genomics of schizophrenia research project taking place in South Africa, from the perspective of the research team. DISCUSSION: Four broad discussion topics emerged during the CAB meetings namely: 1) informed consent procedures, 2) recruitment strategies, 3) patient illness beliefs and stigma experiences, and 4) specific ethical concerns relating to the project. The authors consider these discussions in terms of their contributions to instrumental and intrinsic goals of community engagement. The CAB gave valuable input on the consent processes and materials, recruitment strategies and suggested ways of minimizing the potential for stigma and discrimination. All of these contributions were of an instrumental nature, and helped improve the way in which the research took place. In addition, and perhaps more importantly, the CAB made a unique and important contribution relating to intrinsic functions such as promoting the respect and dignity of research participants and their community. This was particularly evident in ensuring sensitivity and respect of the community's traditional beliefs about schizophrenia and its treatment, and in this way promoting a respectful relationship between the research team and the participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.