Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26134927›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of technology assessment in health care2015

Framework for systematic identification of ethical aspects of healthcare technologies: the SBU approach.

Emelie Heintz, Laura Lintamo, Monica Hultcrantz, Stella Jacobson, Ragnar Levi, Christian Munthe, Sofia Tranæus, Pernilla Östlund, Lars Sandman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Local analgesia in paediatric dentistry: a systematic review of techniques and pharmacologic agents.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2017
    Pooled it
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Ethics domains in full health technology assessment reports: an attempt to begin mapping the field.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Advanced therapy medicinal products: value judgement and ethical evaluation in health technology assessment.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2020
    Article
  19. Some reflections on the use of inappropriate comparators in CEA.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Emelie Heintz
Laura Lintamo
Monica Hultcrantz
Stella Jacobson
Ragnar Levi
Christian Munthe
Sofia Tranæus
Pernilla Östlund
Lars Sandman

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAssessment of ethical aspects of a technology is an important component of health technology assessment (HTA). Nevertheless, how the implementation of ethical assessment in HTA is to be organized and adapted to specific regulatory and organizational settings remains unclear. The objective of this study is to present a framework for systematic identification of ethical aspects of health technologies. Furthermore, the process of developing and adapting the framework to a specific setting is described.

methodsThe framework was developed based on an inventory of existing approaches to identification and assessment of ethical aspects in HTA. In addition, the framework was adapted to the Swedish legal and organizational healthcare context, to the role of the HTA agency and to the use of non-ethicists. The framework was reviewed by a group of ethicists working in the field as well as by a wider set of interested parties including industry, interest groups, and other potential users.

resultsThe framework consists of twelve items with sub-questions, short explanations, and a concluding overall summary. The items are organized into four different themes: the effects of the intervention on health, its compatibility with ethical norms, structural factors with ethical implications, and long term ethical consequences of using the intervention.

conclusionsIn this study, a framework for identifying ethical aspects of health technologies is proposed. The general considerations and methodological approach to this venture will hopefully inspire and present important insights to organizations in other national contexts interested in making similar adaptations.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisEthical AnalysisHealth Care RationingHuman RightsHumansMoralsSwedenTechnology Assessment, Biomedical

Identifiers

PMID26134927
PMCPMC4535323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.