Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26134885›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2016

Comparative analysis of cadmium-zincum-telluride cameras dedicated to myocardial perfusion SPECT: A phantom study.

Orazio Zoccarato, Domenico Lizio, Annarita Savi, Luca Indovina, Camilla Scabbio, Lucia Leva, Angelo Del Sole, Claudio Marcassa, Roberta Matheoud, Michela Lecchi and 1 more

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Multi-center study of inter-rater reproducibility, image quality, and diagnostic accuracy of CZT versus conventional SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. A machine learning-based approach to directly compare the diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion imaging by conventional and cadmium-zinc telluride SPECT.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Comparison between NJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  7. OptimalJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Impact of non-specific normal databases on perfusion quantification of low-dose myocardial SPECT studies.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019
    Article
  10. Advances in imaging instrumentation for nuclear cardiology.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Differences in polar-map patterns using the novel technologies for myocardial perfusion imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2017
    Article
  13. Comparative analysis of full-time, half-time, and quarter-time myocardial ECG-gated SPECT quantification in normal-weight and overweight patients.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2017
    Article
  14. Review
  15. CZT cameras: A technological jump for myocardial perfusion SPECT.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2016
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Orazio ZoccaratoUnit of Nuclear Medicine and Department of Cardiology, S. Maugeri Foundation, IRCCS, Scientific Institute of Veruno, Veruno, NO, Italy.
Domenico LizioDepartments of Medical Physics and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital 'Maggiore della Carità', Novara, Italy.
Annarita SaviDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Luca IndovinaDepartment of Medical Physics, Polyclinic Agostino Gemelli, Rome, Italy.
Camilla ScabbioDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Milan and Nuclear Medicine Unit, San Paolo Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Lucia LevaDepartments of Medical Physics and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital 'Maggiore della Carità', Novara, Italy.
Angelo Del SoleDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Milan and Nuclear Medicine Unit, San Paolo Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Claudio MarcassaUnit of Nuclear Medicine and Department of Cardiology, S. Maugeri Foundation, IRCCS, Scientific Institute of Veruno, Veruno, NO, Italy.
Roberta MatheoudDepartments of Medical Physics and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital 'Maggiore della Carità', Novara, Italy.
Michela LecchiDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Milan and Nuclear Medicine Unit, San Paolo Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Marco BrambillaDepartments of Medical Physics and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital 'Maggiore della Carità', Novara, Italy. marco.brambilla@maggioreosp.novara.it.
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Maggiore della Carita · ITOspedale San Paolo · ITIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri · ITAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis investigation used image data generated by an anthropomorphic phantom with a cardiac insert for a comparison between two solid state cameras: D-SPECT and D530c.

methodsFor each camera, two sets (with and without a simulated transmural defect (TD)) of scans were acquired starting from the in vivo standard count statistics in the left ventricle (LV). Other two acquisitions corresponding to 150% and 50% of the reference count statistics were acquired. Five performance indices related to spatial resolution, contrast, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were analyzed.

resultsD-SPECT showed a lower LV wall thickness and an inferior sharpness than D530c. No significant differences were found in terms of contrast between LV wall and the inner cavity, TD contrast or CNR. No significant differences were observed in CNR when moving from the reference level of count statistics down to 50% or up to 150% of the counts acquired on the LV.

conclusionsOur results show that D-SPECT and D530c have different performances. The lack of differences in the image performance indices along the range of count statistics explored, indicates that there is the possibility for a further reduction in the injected activity and/or the acquisition time, for both systems.

Indexed as

CadmiumGamma CamerasTelluriumZincEquipment DesignEquipment Failure AnalysisHumansMyocardial Perfusion ImagingPhantoms, ImagingReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonCadmiumCdZnTeTelluriumZincCadmium-zincum-tellurideCardiacSPECT

Identifiers

PMID26134885
OpenAlexW827922813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.