Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26134828›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Pros and cons of methylation-based enrichment methods for ancient DNA.

Andaine Seguin-Orlando, Cristina Gamba, Clio Der Sarkissian, Luca Ermini, Guillaume Louvel, Eugenia Boulygina, Alexey Sokolov, Artem Nedoluzhko, Eline D Lorenzen, Patricio Lopez and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Million Years of Mammoth Mitogenome Evolution.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Predicting Archaic Hominin Phenotypes from Genomic Data.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Inferring Past Environments from Ancient Epigenomes.Molecular biology and evolution · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Evolutionary adaptation revealed by comparative genome analysis of woolly mammoths and elephants.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2017
    Article
  17. Human evolution: a tale from ancient genomes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 11 institutions in 6 countries.

Andaine Seguin-OrlandoCentre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, Øster Voldgade 5-7, 1350K Copenhagen, Denmark.
Cristina GambaCentre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, Øster Voldgade 5-7, 1350K Copenhagen, Denmark.
Clio Der SarkissianCentre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, Øster Voldgade 5-7, 1350K Copenhagen, Denmark.
Luca ErminiCentre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, Øster Voldgade 5-7, 1350K Copenhagen, Denmark.
Guillaume LouvelCentre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, Øster Voldgade 5-7, 1350K Copenhagen, Denmark.
Eugenia BoulyginaNational Research Centre Kurchatov Institute, 1, Akademika Kurchatova, Moscow, 123182, Russian Federation.
Alexey SokolovCentre Bioengineering, Russian Academy of Sciences, Prospekt 60-Letiya Oktyabrya 7/1, Moscow, 117312, Russian Federation.
Artem NedoluzhkoNational Research Centre Kurchatov Institute, 1, Akademika Kurchatova, Moscow, 123182, Russian Federation.
Eline D LorenzenCentre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, Øster Voldgade 5-7, 1350K Copenhagen, Denmark.
Patricio LopezDepartment of Anthropology, Universidad de Chile, Ignacio Carrera Pinto 1045, Ñuñoa, Santiago, Chile.
H Gregory McDonaldPark Museum Management Program, National Park Service, 1201 Oakridge Drive, Suite 150, Fort Collins, Colorado 80525, USA.
Eric ScottSan Bernardino County Museum, Division of Geological Sciences, 2024 Orange Tree Lane, Redlands, California 92374, USA.
Alexei TikhonovZoological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russian Federation.
Thomas W StaffordCentre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, Øster Voldgade 5-7, 1350K Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ahmed H AlfarhanZoology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Saleh A AlquraishiZoology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Khaled A S Al-RasheidZoology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Beth ShapiroDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, USA.
Eske WillerslevCentre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, Øster Voldgade 5-7, 1350K Copenhagen, Denmark.
Egor ProkhortchoukNational Research Centre Kurchatov Institute, 1, Akademika Kurchatova, Moscow, 123182, Russian Federation.
Ludovic OrlandoCentre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, Øster Voldgade 5-7, 1350K Copenhagen, Denmark.
Natural History Museum Aarhus · DKKing Saud University · SAKurchatov Institute · RUNatural History Museum of Denmark · DKHigh Throughput Biology (United States) · USLos Angeles County Museum of Art · USNational Park Service · USNorth-Eastern Federal University · RURussian Academy of Sciences · RUUniversity of California, Santa Cruz · USUniversity of Chile · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent discovery that DNA methylation survives in fossil material provides an opportunity for novel molecular approaches in palaeogenomics. Here, we apply to ancient DNA extracts the probe-independent Methylated Binding Domains (MBD)-based enrichment method, which targets DNA molecules containing methylated CpGs. Using remains of a Palaeo-Eskimo Saqqaq individual, woolly mammoths, polar bears and two equine species, we confirm that DNA methylation survives in a variety of tissues, environmental contexts and over a large temporal range (4,000 to over 45,000 years before present). MBD enrichment, however, appears principally biased towards the recovery of CpG-rich and long DNA templates and is limited by the fast post-mortem cytosine deamination rates of methylated epialleles. This method, thus, appears only appropriate for the analysis of ancient methylomes from very well preserved samples, where both DNA fragmentation and deamination have been limited. This work represents an essential step toward the characterization of ancient methylation signatures, which will help understanding the role of epigenetic changes in past environmental and cultural transitions.

Indexed as

AnimalsDNADNA MethylationFossilsMammothsUrsidaeDNA

Identifiers

PMID26134828
PMCPMC4488743
OpenAlexW2260469498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.