Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26134765›Full record

ArticleEndoscopy international open2015

Narrow-band imaging and white-light endoscopy with optical magnification in the diagnosis of dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus: results of the Asia-Pacific Barrett's Consortium.

Rajvinder Singh, Mahesh Jayanna, Jennie Wong, Lee Guan Lim, Jun Zhang, Jing Lv, Dong Liu, Yi-Chia Lee, Ming-Lun Han, Ping-Huei Tseng and 21 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopy international open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03191604 (A Multicenter Study Evaluating the Impact of NBI on Patients With Barrett's Esophagus Associated Neoplasia Undergoing Endoscopic Eradication Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03191604 completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

A Multicenter Study Evaluating the Impact of NBI on Patients With Barrett's Esophagus Associated Neoplasia Undergoing Endoscopic Eradication Therapy (EET)

TypeobservationalSponsorNorthwestern UniversityRan2017 to 2019Enrolled46ConditionsBarrett EsophagusArmsVideo intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Strategy for esophageal non-epithelial tumors based on a retrospective analysis of a single facility.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Recent Advances in Non-invasive Esophageal Tissue Sampling.Current gastroenterology reports · 2017
    Review
  8. Role of endoscopy in early oesophageal cancer.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2016
    Review
  9. Endoscopic modalities for the diagnosis of Barrett's oesophagus.United European gastroenterology journal · 2016
    Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors at 20 institutions in 12 countries.

Rajvinder SinghLyell McEwin Hospital, Adelaide, Australia ; University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Mahesh JayannaLyell McEwin Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.
Jennie WongDepartment of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Lee Guan LimDepartment of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Jun ZhangDivision of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Jing LvDivision of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Dong LiuDivision of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Yi-Chia LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ming-Lun HanDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ping-Huei TsengDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Vikneswaran NamasivayamDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Rupa BanerjeeAsian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India.
Noriya UedoOsaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Osaka, Japan.
Wah Kheong ChanDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Shiaw Hooi HoDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Shi-Yao ChenInstitute of Endoscopy, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Shobna BhatiaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Kohei FunasakaDepartment of Endoscopy, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya City, Aichi, Japan.
Takafumi AndoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya City, Aichi, Japan.
Justin WuInstitute of Digestive Disease, Department of Medicine & Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Cosmas LesmanaDepartment of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
William TamLyell McEwin Hospital, Adelaide, Australia ; University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Wen-Lun WangDepartment of Internal Medicine, E-Da Hospital/I-Shou University, Kaohshiung, Taiwan.
Chi-Yang ChangDepartment of Internal Medicine, E-Da Hospital/I-Shou University, Kaohshiung, Taiwan.
Hwoon-Yong JungDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Kee Wook JungDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Muhammad Begawan BestariDepartment of Internal Medicine, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia.
Kenshi YaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Fukuoka University, Chikushi Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Vui Heng ChongDepartment of Gastroenterology, RIPAS Hospital, Brunei Darussalam.
Prateek SharmaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Veterans Affairs Medical Centre and University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, United States.
Khek-Yu HoDepartment of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Lyell McEwin Hospital · AUNational Taiwan University Hospital · TWNational University of Singapore · SGSecond Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University · CNAsan Medical Center · KRE-Da Hospital · TWUniversity of Malaya · MYAsian Institute of Gastroenterology · INChinese University of Hong Kong · HKFukuoka University · JPKing Edward Memorial Hospital and Seth G.S. Medical College · INNagoya City University · JPNagoya University Hospital · JPOsaka International Cancer Institute · JPPadjadjaran University · IDRaja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Hospital · BNRumah Sakit Umum Pusat Nasional Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo · IDSingapore General Hospital · SGUniversity of Kansas · USZhongshan Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe advent and utility of new endoscopic imaging modalities for predicting the histology of Barrett's esophagus (BE) in real time with high accuracy appear promising and could potentially obviate the need to perform random biopsies where guidelines are poorly adhered to. We embarked on evaluating the performance characteristics of white-light endoscopy with magnification (WLE-z), narrow-band imaging with magnification (NBI-z) and a combination of both modalities.

designThis was a prospective online study with 28 endoscopists from 11 countries (Asia-Pacific region) participating as assessors. In total, 35 patients with BE were assessed using 150 slides from WLE-z and NBI-z randomly arranged using a simple classification with corresponding histology. The overall Accuracy (Acc), Sensitivity (Sn), Specificity (Sp), Positive Predictive Value (PPV), and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of WLE-z, NBI-z and a combination of both were calculated.

resultsThe overall Acc for WLE-z and NBI-z images was 87.1 % and 88.7 %, respectively. When images from the two modalities were placed side by side, the Acc increased to 90.3 %. The Sn, Sp, PPV, and NPV of WLE-z were 48 %, 92 %, 45 %, and 93 % while with NBI-z, these improved to 89 %, 89 %, 56 %, and 98 %, respectively. When both imaging modalities were viewed together, they improved further to 93 %, 90 %, 61 %, and 99 %.

conclusionThe high NPV (99 %) when both WLE-z and NBI-z were used simultaneously indicates that areas with regular appearance that are diagnosed with confidence can effectively be left alone and not biopsied when performed at a skilled resourced center. This approach could potentially lead to a paradigm shift of how patients with BE are assessed.

Identifiers

PMID26134765
PMCPMC4423324
OpenAlexW2176608739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.