ArticleEndoscopy international open2015
Narrow-band imaging and white-light endoscopy with optical magnification in the diagnosis of dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus: results of the Asia-Pacific Barrett's Consortium.
Article in Endoscopy international open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03191604 (A Multicenter Study Evaluating the Impact of NBI on Patients With Barrett's Esophagus Associated Neoplasia Undergoing Endoscopic Eradication Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicenter Study Evaluating the Impact of NBI on Patients With Barrett's Esophagus Associated Neoplasia Undergoing Endoscopic Eradication Therapy (EET)
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advanced imaging (narrow band and acetic acid chromoendoscopy) and guided biopsies in surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus: a systematic review.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2026Pooled it
- Current Status of Mucosal Imaging with Narrow-Band Imaging in the Esophagus.Gut and liver · 2021Review
- Delay in Diagnosis of Barrett's Esophagus Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons Learned.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2020Article
- Diffuse endoscopically visible, predominantly low grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus (with video).Endoscopy international open · 2019Article
- Strategy for esophageal non-epithelial tumors based on a retrospective analysis of a single facility.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2018Article
- Diagnostic accuracies of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration with distinct negative pressure suction techniques in solid lesions: A retrospective study.Oncology letters · 2017Article
- Recent Advances in Non-invasive Esophageal Tissue Sampling.Current gastroenterology reports · 2017Review
- Role of endoscopy in early oesophageal cancer.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2016Review
- Endoscopic modalities for the diagnosis of Barrett's oesophagus.United European gastroenterology journal · 2016Review
- Recent Updates in the Endoscopic Diagnosis of Barrett's Oesophagus.Gastrointestinal tumors · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors at 20 institutions in 12 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe advent and utility of new endoscopic imaging modalities for predicting the histology of Barrett's esophagus (BE) in real time with high accuracy appear promising and could potentially obviate the need to perform random biopsies where guidelines are poorly adhered to. We embarked on evaluating the performance characteristics of white-light endoscopy with magnification (WLE-z), narrow-band imaging with magnification (NBI-z) and a combination of both modalities.
designThis was a prospective online study with 28 endoscopists from 11 countries (Asia-Pacific region) participating as assessors. In total, 35 patients with BE were assessed using 150 slides from WLE-z and NBI-z randomly arranged using a simple classification with corresponding histology. The overall Accuracy (Acc), Sensitivity (Sn), Specificity (Sp), Positive Predictive Value (PPV), and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of WLE-z, NBI-z and a combination of both were calculated.
resultsThe overall Acc for WLE-z and NBI-z images was 87.1 % and 88.7 %, respectively. When images from the two modalities were placed side by side, the Acc increased to 90.3 %. The Sn, Sp, PPV, and NPV of WLE-z were 48 %, 92 %, 45 %, and 93 % while with NBI-z, these improved to 89 %, 89 %, 56 %, and 98 %, respectively. When both imaging modalities were viewed together, they improved further to 93 %, 90 %, 61 %, and 99 %.
conclusionThe high NPV (99 %) when both WLE-z and NBI-z were used simultaneously indicates that areas with regular appearance that are diagnosed with confidence can effectively be left alone and not biopsied when performed at a skilled resourced center. This approach could potentially lead to a paradigm shift of how patients with BE are assessed.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.