Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26134706›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2015

Quantitative comparison of the microscopic anatomy of the human ACL femoral and tibial entheses.

Mélanie L Beaulieu, Grace E Carey, Stephen H Schlecht, Edward M Wojtys, James A Ashton-Miller

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Anatomical Tissue Engineering of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Entheses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. State of the mineralized tissue comprising the femoral ACL enthesis in young women with an ACL failure.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2022
    Article
  12. Relationship between altered knee kinematics and subchondral bone remodeling in a clinically translational model of ACL injury.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. [The killer turn in the posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: mechanism and improvement].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2020
    Review
  16. Morphology of Mouse Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Complex Changes Following Exercise During Pubertal Growth.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2019
    Article
  17. An Anterior Cruciate Ligament Failure Mechanism.The American journal of sports medicine · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Permanent knee sensorimotor system changes following ACL injury and surgery.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2017
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mélanie L BeaulieuSchool of Kinesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Grace E CareySchool of Kinesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Stephen H SchlechtDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Edward M WojtysDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
James A Ashton-MillerSchool of Kinesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
University of Michigan · US

Funding

Tissue Engineering and RegenerationT32DE007057 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DAVID H. KOHN · 1985 to 2026
$17.3M
New Perspectives on ACL InjuryR01AR054821 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ASHTON-MILLER, JAMES ANTHONY, WOJTYS, EDWARD M · 2007 to 2021
$3.1M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR054821NIDCR NIH HHS T32 DE007057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The femoral enthesis of the human anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is known to be more susceptible to injury than the tibial enthesis. To determine whether anatomic differences might help explain this difference, we quantified the microscopic appearance of both entheses in 15 unembalmed knee specimens using light microscopy, toluidine blue stain and image analysis. The amount of calcified fibrocartilage and uncalcified fibrocartilage, and the ligament entheseal attachment angle were then compared between the femoral and tibial entheses via linear mixed-effects models. The results showed marked differences in anatomy between the two entheses. The femoral enthesis exhibited a 3.9-fold more acute ligament attachment angle than the tibial enthesis (p<0.001), a 43% greater calcified fibrocartilage tissue area (p<0.001), and a 226% greater uncalcified fibrocartilage depth (p<0.001), with the latter differences being particularly pronounced in the central region. We conclude that the ACL femoral enthesis has more fibrocartilage and a more acute ligament attachment angle than the tibial enthesis, which provides insight into why it is more vulnerable to failure.

Indexed as

AdultAnterior Cruciate LigamentAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionCalcinosisCartilageFemaleFemurFibrocartilageHumansKnee InjuriesMaleMicroscopyMiddle AgedTibiaanatomyanterior cruciate ligamententhesisfibrocartilagehistology

Identifiers

PMID26134706
PMCPMC4628572
OpenAlexW2135194326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.