Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26134673›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

The Intra- and Inter-Rater Reliability of an Instrumented Spasticity Assessment in Children with Cerebral Palsy.

Simon-Henri Schless, Kaat Desloovere, Erwin Aertbeliën, Guy Molenaers, Catherine Huenaerts, Lynn Bar-On

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03307135 (Medical Spastic Patient Machine Interface MSPMI), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03307135 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Medical Spastic Patient Machine Interface MSPMI : Biomechanical and Electrophysiological Assessment of the Triceps Surae Spasticity

TypeinterventionalSponsorNantes University HospitalRan2017 to 2020Enrolled67ConditionsSpasticity, MuscleArmssingle assessment with the MSPMI, double assessment with the MSPMI with 7 days of interval, double assessment with the MSPMI before and after treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Technology-assisted assessment of spasticity: a systematic review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Simon-Henri SchlessClinical Motion Analysis Laboratory, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Kaat DesloovereClinical Motion Analysis Laboratory, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Erwin AertbeliënDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Guy MolenaersClinical Motion Analysis Laboratory, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Departments of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Orthopaedic Medicine, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Catherine HuenaertsClinical Motion Analysis Laboratory, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Lynn Bar-OnClinical Motion Analysis Laboratory, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimDespite the impact of spasticity, there is a lack of objective, clinically reliable and valid tools for its assessment. This study aims to evaluate the reliability of various performance- and spasticity-related parameters collected with a manually controlled instrumented spasticity assessment in four lower limb muscles in children with cerebral palsy (CP).

methodThe lateral gastrocnemius, medial hamstrings, rectus femoris and hip adductors of 12 children with spastic CP (12.8 years, ±4.13 years, bilateral/unilateral involvement n=7/5) were passively stretched in the sagittal plane at incremental velocities. Muscle activity, joint motion, and torque were synchronously recorded using electromyography, inertial sensors, and a force/torque load-cell. Reliability was assessed on three levels: (1) intra- and (2) inter-rater within session, and (3) intra-rater between session.

resultsParameters were found to be reliable in all three analyses, with 90% containing intra-class correlation coefficients >0.6, and 70% of standard error of measurement values <20% of the mean values. The most reliable analysis was intra-rater within session, followed by intra-rater between session, and then inter-rater within session. The Adds evaluation had a slightly lower level of reliability than that of the other muscles.

conclusionsLimited intrinsic/extrinsic errors were introduced by repeated stretch repetitions. The parameters were more reliable when the same rater, rather than different raters performed the evaluation. Standardisation and training should be further improved to reduce extrinsic error when different raters perform the measurement. Errors were also muscle specific, or related to the measurement set-up. They need to be accounted for, in particular when assessing pre-post interventions or longitudinal follow-up. The parameters of the instrumented spasticity assessment demonstrate a wide range of applications for both research and clinical environments in the quantification of spasticity.

Indexed as

AdolescentCerebral PalsyChildChild, PreschoolElectromyographyFemaleHumansLegMuscle, SkeletalMuscle SpasticityObserver VariationRange of Motion, ArticularReproducibility of ResultsTorque

Identifiers

PMID26134673
PMCPMC4489837
OpenAlexW852069368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.