Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26134652›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2015

Re-Emergent Inhibition of Cochlear Inner Hair Cells in a Mouse Model of Hearing Loss.

Stephen Paul Zachary, Paul Albert Fuchs

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Insights into Presbycusis From the First Temporal Bone Laboratory Within the United States.Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephen Paul ZacharySolomon H. Snyder Department of Neuroscience, Centers for Sensory Biology and Hearing and Balance, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205.
Paul Albert FuchsSolomon H. Snyder Department of Neuroscience, Department of Otolaryngology, and Centers for Sensory Biology and Hearing and Balance, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205 pfuchs1@jhmi.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4627-4114
Johns Hopkins University · USSensory (United States) · US

Funding

THE CHOLINERGIC RESPONSE OF COCHLEAR HAIR CELLSR01DC001508 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Amanda M. Lauer · 1992 to 2026
$13.2M
The Histology CoreP30DC005211 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FUCHS, PAUL ALBERT · 2002 to 2016
$9.1M
Training Program in Hearing and BalanceT32DC000023 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CULLEN, KATHLEEN E · 1989 to 2025
$8.7M
Efferent innervation of inner hair cells in the aged/damaged cochleaF31DC014184 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ZACHARY, STEPHEN · 2014 to 2016
$84k
NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC014184NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC005211NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC001508NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hearing loss among the elderly correlates with diminished social, mental, and physical health. Age-related cochlear cell death does occur, but growing anatomical evidence suggests that synaptic rearrangements on sensory hair cells also contribute to auditory functional decline. Here we present voltage-clamp recordings from inner hair cells of the C57BL/6J mouse model of age-related hearing loss, which reveal that cholinergic synaptic inputs re-emerge during aging. These efferents are functionally inhibitory, using the same ionic mechanisms as do efferent contacts present transiently before the developmental onset of hearing. The strength of efferent inhibition of inner hair cells increases with hearing threshold elevation. These data indicate that the aged cochlea regains features of the developing cochlea and that efferent inhibition of the primary receptors of the auditory system re-emerges with hearing impairment. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Synaptic changes in the auditory periphery are increasingly recognized as important factors in hearing loss. To date, anatomical work has described the loss of afferent contacts from cochlear hair cells. However, relatively little is known about the efferent innervation of the cochlea during hearing loss. We performed intracellular recordings from mouse inner hair cells across the lifespan and show that efferent innervation of inner hair cells arises in parallel with the loss of afferent contacts and elevated hearing threshold during aging. These efferent neurons inhibit inner hair cells, raising the possibility that they play a role in the progression of age-related hearing loss.

Indexed as

AcetylcholineAge FactorsAlcohol OxidoreductasesAnimalsAnimals, NewbornApaminCalcium Channel BlockersCochleaConotoxinsCo-Repressor ProteinsCurareDisease Models, AnimalDNA-Binding ProteinsEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemFemaleGlycine AgentsAcetylcholineACV1, Conus textileAlcohol OxidoreductasesApaminCalcium Channel BlockersConotoxinsCo-Repressor ProteinsCtbp2 protein, mouseCurareDNA-Binding ProteinsGlycine AgentsNeuromuscular Nondepolarizing AgentsPhosphoproteinsStrychnineage-related hearing losscholinergic inhibitioncochleainner hair cellolivocochlear systemsynaptic transmission

Identifiers

PMID26134652
PMCPMC4571504
OpenAlexW1616681851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.