Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26134645›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2015

Differential Effect of Neuropeptides on Excitatory Synaptic Transmission in Human Epileptic Hippocampus.

Marco Ledri, Andreas T Sørensen, Marita G Madsen, Søren H Christiansen, Litsa Nikitidou Ledri, Alessandra Cifra, Johan Bengzon, Eva Lindberg, Lars H Pinborg, Bo Jespersen and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Different types ofIBRO neuroscience reports · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Glioblastoma CD105Acta neuropathologica communications · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Insights into Potential Targets for Therapeutic Intervention in Epilepsy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. NPY and Gene Therapy for Epilepsy: How, When,... and Y.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Marco LedriExperimental Epilepsy Group, Epilepsy Center, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University Hospital, 22184 Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8317-7976
Andreas T SørensenExperimental Epilepsy Group, Epilepsy Center, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University Hospital, 22184 Lund, Sweden.
Marita G MadsenExperimental Epilepsy Group, Epilepsy Center, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University Hospital, 22184 Lund, Sweden.
Søren H ChristiansenLaboratory of Neural Plasticity, Department of Neuroscience and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Litsa Nikitidou LedriExperimental Epilepsy Group, Epilepsy Center, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University Hospital, 22184 Lund, Sweden.
Alessandra CifraExperimental Epilepsy Group, Epilepsy Center, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University Hospital, 22184 Lund, Sweden.
Johan BengzonLund Stem Cell Center, BMC B10, and Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Sciences and.
Eva LindbergDivision of Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University Hospital, 22184 Lund, Sweden, and.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0602-3815
Lars H PinborgEpilepsy Clinic & Neurobiology Research Unit and.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9024-7936
Bo JespersenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6417-1234
Casper R GøtzscheLaboratory of Neural Plasticity, Department of Neuroscience and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
David P D WoldbyeLaboratory of Neural Plasticity, Department of Neuroscience and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
My AnderssonExperimental Epilepsy Group, Epilepsy Center, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University Hospital, 22184 Lund, Sweden.
Merab KokaiaExperimental Epilepsy Group, Epilepsy Center, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University Hospital, 22184 Lund, Sweden, Merab.Kokaia@med.lu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7984-3921
University of Copenhagen · DKEpilepsy Foundation · AULund University · SERigshospitalet · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Development of novel disease-modifying treatment strategies for neurological disorders, which at present have no cure, represents a major challenge for today's neurology. Translation of findings from animal models to humans represents an unresolved gap in most of the preclinical studies. Gene therapy is an evolving innovative approach that may prove useful for clinical applications. In animal models of temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), gene therapy treatments based on viral vectors encoding NPY or galanin have been shown to effectively suppress seizures. However, how this translates to human TLE remains unknown. A unique possibility to validate these animal studies is provided by a surgical therapeutic approach, whereby resected epileptic tissue from temporal lobes of pharmacoresistant patients are available for neurophysiological studies in vitro. To test whether NPY and galanin have antiepileptic actions in human epileptic tissue as well, we applied these neuropeptides directly to human hippocampal slices in vitro. NPY strongly decreased stimulation-induced EPSPs in dentate gyrus and CA1 (up to 30 and 55%, respectively) via Y2 receptors, while galanin had no significant effect. Receptor autoradiographic binding revealed the presence of both NPY and galanin receptors, while functional receptor binding was only detected for NPY, suggesting that galanin receptor signaling may be impaired. These results underline the importance of validating findings from animal studies in human brain tissue, and advocate for NPY as a more appropriate candidate than galanin for future gene therapy trials in pharmacoresistant TLE patients.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultEpilepsyExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsFemaleGalaninGuanosine 5'-O-(3-Thiotriphosphate)HippocampusHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMaleMembrane PotentialsMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMiddle AgedNeuropeptide YPatch-Clamp TechniquesGalaninGuanosine 5'-O-(3-Thiotriphosphate)Microtubule-Associated ProteinsNeuropeptide YReceptors, GalaninReceptors, Neuropeptide YSulfur Isotopesgalaningene therapyhippocampusNPYtemporal lobe epilepsy

Identifiers

PMID26134645
PMCPMC6605141
OpenAlexW1744561736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.