Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26134359›Full record

Observational studyIntensive care medicine2015

β-D-Glucan and Candida albicans germ tube antibody in ICU patients with invasive candidiasis.

Estrella Martín-Mazuelos, Ana Loza, Carmen Castro, Desirée Macías, Ismail Zakariya, Pedro Saavedra, Sergio Ruiz-Santana, Elena Marín, Cristóbal León

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Intensive care medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Diagnostic performance of β-(1→3)-D-glucan, twoJournal of clinical microbiology · 2026
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Sensitivity of Serum Beta-D-Glucan in Candidemia According toJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  11. Coinfection with HypervirulentInfection and drug resistance · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Changes in the epidemiological landscape of invasive candidiasis.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2018
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Estrella Martín-MazuelosClinical Unit of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario de Valme, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.
Ana Loza
Carmen Castro
Desirée Macías
Ismail Zakariya
Pedro Saavedra
Sergio Ruiz-Santana
Elena Marín
Cristóbal León
Universidad de Sevilla · ESHospital Universitario de Valme · ESHospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín · ESUniversidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the performance of (1→3)-β-D-glucan (BDG) and Candida albicans germ tube antibody (CAGTA) for the diagnosis of invasive candidiasis (IC) in a prospective cohort of 107 unselected, non-neutropenic ICU patients.

methodsBDG (cutoff positivity ≥80 pg/mL) and CAGTA (cutoff positivity ≥1/160) assays were performed twice a week. Confounding factors included amoxicillin-clavulanate and piperacillin-tazobactam treatments, recent surgery, Gram-positive bloodstream infection, renal replacement therapy, and enteral nutrition. Patients were classified as neither colonized nor infected (n = 29), Candida spp. colonization (n = 63) (low grade, n = 32; high grade, n = 31), and invasive candidiasis (IC) (n = 15).

resultsBDG levels were higher in patients with IC and high-grade colonization than in the remaining groups (p = 0.012), and two consecutive measurements ≥80 pg/mL discriminated IC from the remaining groups (sensitivity 80%, specificity 75.7%). For the discrimination between IC and Candida spp. colonization, the AUC for the maximum value of BDG was 0.667 (95% CI 0.544-0.790) and for the maximum value of CAGTA 0.545 (95% CI 0.395-0.694). Significant changes of BDG and CAGTA kinetics in IC patients treated with antifungals were not observed. In patients neither colonized nor infected or with low-grade Candida spp. colonization, none of the confounding factors was associated with a significant increase in BDG positivity.

conclusionsTwo consecutive BDG levels ≥80 pg/mL allowed discrimination among IC and high-grade colonization. Systemic antifungal therapy could not be monitored with biomarker kinetics, and BDG levels were not subject to interference by confounding factors in either colonized or infected patients or with low-grade colonization.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntibodies, Fungalbeta-GlucansBiomarkersCandida albicansCandidiasis, InvasiveCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificitySpainAntibodies, Fungalbeta-GlucansBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID26134359
OpenAlexW765271840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.