Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26134115›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2015

Mothers' perspectives on the perinatal loss of a co-twin: a qualitative study.

Judy Richards, Ruth Graham, Nicholas D Embleton, Claire Campbell, Judith Rankin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Parents' Wishes for What They Had or Had Not Done and Their Coping After Their Infant's or Child's Neonatal Intensive Care Unit/Pediatric Intensive Care Unit/Emergency Department Death.Journal of hospice and palliative nursing : JHPN : the official journal of the Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Health professionals' perspectives on bereavement following loss from a twin pregnancy: a qualitative study.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2016
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Judy RichardsInstitute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, England, NE2 4AE, UK. judy.richards@ncl.ac.uk.
Ruth GrahamSchool of Geography, Politics and Sociology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, England, NE1 7RU, UK. ruth.graham@ncl.ac.uk.
Nicholas D EmbletonInstitute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, England, NE2 4AE, UK. nicholas.embleton@ncl.ac.uk.
Claire CampbellNewcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Neonatal Service, Newcastle upon Tyne, England, NE2 4AE, UK. claire.campbell35@yahoo.com.
Judith RankinInstitute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, England, NE2 4AE, UK. judith.rankin@ncl.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K02325X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a growing body of literature exploring the emotional impact of perinatal loss upon parents but only limited research focussing specifically on the views and experiences of parents who have experienced a loss from a twin or higher order pregnancy. We undertook a qualitative study to provide an in-depth understanding of the experiences of mothers who have had a loss from a twin pregnancy and subsequently continued visiting hospital whilst their surviving twin was cared for.

methodsA qualitative study involving semi-structured interviews. Mothers were recruited from a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and Fetal Medicine department. Fourteen interviews were carried out with mothers who had experienced a loss in pregnancy or the neonatal period and had a surviving twin on the neonatal unit. Data were analysed using a generative thematic approach.

resultsThe analysis identified three key themes in the accounts mothers gave of their experiences: the status of 'special'; the importance of trust; and control and empowerment. Where the surviving co-twin remained in hospital for many weeks, mothers described the emotional support of health professionals as crucial to their wellbeing. Few mothers sought formal bereavement support, instead they kept their grief 'on hold' in order to support their surviving baby. Due to the trauma of their loss, mothers reflected that they had been unable to make informed decisions, in particular in relation to the funeral of their deceased baby.

conclusionsOur study highlighted that there are a specific set of issues for mothers who have lost a baby from a twin pregnancy. Relatively small changes to practice however, made a significant difference to wellbeing during their time in hospital with a surviving twin. Findings from this research will provide insight into the needs of bereaved mothers, will inform healthcare planning and the development of care packages.

Indexed as

Attitude to DeathPerinatal DeathTwinsAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultBereavementFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInterviews as TopicMothersPower, PsychologicalPregnancyPregnancy, TwinQualitative ResearchTrust

Identifiers

PMID26134115
PMCPMC4488109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.