ArticleBMC bioinformatics2015
MetaDiff: differential isoform expression analysis using random-effects meta-regression.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrated transcriptomics and machine learning reveal diagnostic biomarkers and immune-stromal remodeling in ischemic heart failure.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Identification and analysis of pyroptosis-related key genes in heart failure.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Article
- A Novel Disulfidptosis-Related Diagnostic Gene Signature and Differential Expression Validation in Ischaemic Cardiomyopathy.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025Article
- Heart Failure Is Closely Associated With the Expression Characteristics of Type I Interferon-Related Genes.Clinical cardiology · 2025Article
- Bioinformatics analysis of FCER1A as a key immune marker in dilated cardiomyopathy and systemic lupus erythematosus.American journal of clinical and experimental immunology · 2025Article
- Identification of key genes for heart failure in dilated cardiomyopathy in different populations.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- DELongSeq for efficient detection of differential isoform expression from long-read RNA-seq data.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Identification of eQTLs and sQTLs associated with meat quality in beef.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- RNA-seq analysis identifies cytoskeletal structural genes and pathways for meat quality in beef.PloS one · 2020Article
- A dynamic NCell research · 2018Article
- A Bayesian model selection approach for identifying differentially expressed transcripts from RNA sequencing data.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics · 2018Article
- Differential analyses for RNA-seq: transcript-level estimates improve gene-level inferences.F1000Research · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) allows an unbiased survey of the entire transcriptome in a high-throughput manner. A major application of RNA-Seq is to detect differential isoform expression across experimental conditions, which is of great biological interest due to its direct relevance to protein function and disease pathogenesis. Detection of differential isoform expression is challenging because of uncertainty in isoform expression estimation owing to ambiguous reads and variability in precision of the estimates across samples. It is desirable to have a method that can account for these issues and is flexible enough to allow adjustment for covariates.
resultsIn this paper, we present MetaDiff, a random-effects meta-regression model that naturally fits for the above purposes. Through extensive simulations and analysis of an RNA-Seq dataset on human heart failure, we show that the random-effects meta-regression approach is computationally fast, reliable, and can improve the power of differential expression analysis while controlling for false positives due to the effect of covariates or confounding variables. In contrast, several existing methods either fail to control false discovery rate or have reduced power in the presence of covariates or confounding variables. The source code, compiled JAR package and documentation of MetaDiff are freely available at https://github.com/jiach/MetaDiff.
conclusionOur results indicate that random-effects meta-regression offers a flexible framework for differential expression analysis of isoforms, particularly when gene expression is influenced by other variables.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.