Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26133975›Full record

ArticleParticle and fibre toxicology2015

Differential bioreactivity of neutral, cationic and anionic polystyrene nanoparticles with cells from the human alveolar compartment: robust response of alveolar type 1 epithelial cells.

Pakatip Ruenraroengsak, Teresa D Tetley

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Particle and fibre toxicology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 157 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Plastics in dermatology: A review and solutions.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Application of magnetic particle imaging to evaluate nanoparticle fate in rodent joints.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Nanomaterial-based contrast agents.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pakatip RuenraroengsakLung Cell Biology, Section of Airways Disease, National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Dovehouse Street, London, SW3 6LY, UK. p.ruenraroengsak@imperial.ac.uk.
Teresa D TetleyLung Cell Biology, Section of Airways Disease, National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Dovehouse Street, London, SW3 6LY, UK. t.tetley@imperial.ac.uk.
Lung Institute · US

Funding

Medical Research Council G0700926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEngineered nanoparticles (NP) are being developed for inhaled drug delivery. This route is non-invasive and the major target; alveolar epithelium provides a large surface area for drug administration and absorption, without first pass metabolism. Understanding the interaction between NPs and target cells is crucial for safe and effective NP-based drug delivery. We explored the differential effect of neutral, cationic and anionic polystyrene latex NPs on the target cells of the human alveolus, using primary human alveolar macrophages (MAC) and primary human alveolar type 2 (AT2) epithelial cells and a unique human alveolar epithelial type I-like cell (TT1). We hypothesized that the bioreactivity of the NPs would relate to their surface chemistry, charge and size as well as the functional role of their interacting cells in vivo.

methodsAmine- (ANP) and carboxyl- surface modified (CNP) and unmodified (UNP) polystyrene NPs, 50 and 100 nm in diameter, were studied. Cells were exposed to 1-100 μg/ml (1.25-125 μg/cm(2); 0 μg/ml control) NP for 4 and 24 h at 37 °C with or without the antioxidant, N-acetyl cysteine (NAC). Cells were assessed for cell viability, reactive oxygen species (ROS), oxidised glutathione (GSSG/GSH ratio), mitochondrial integrity, cell morphology and particle uptake (using electron microscopy and laser scanning confocal microscopy).

resultsANP-induced cell death occurred in all cell types, inducing increased oxidative stress, mitochondrial disruption and release of cytochrome C, indicating apoptotic cell death. UNP and CNP exhibited little cytotoxicity or mitochondrial damage, although they induced ROS in AT2 and MACs. Addition of NAC reduced epithelial cell ROS, but not MAC ROS, for up to 4 h. TT1 and MAC cells internalised all NP formats, whereas only a small fraction of AT2 cells internalized ANP (not UNP or CNP). TT1 cells were the most resistant to the effects of UNP and CNP.

conclusionANP induced marked oxidative damage and cell death via apoptosis in all cell types, while UNP and CNP exhibited low cytotoxicity via oxidative stress. MAC and TT1 cell models show strong particle-internalization compared to the AT2 cell model, reflecting their cell function in vivo. The 50 nm NPs induced a higher bioreactivity in epithelial cells, whereas the 100 nm NPs show a stronger effect on phagocytic cells.

Indexed as

Drug CarriersNanoparticlesAlveolar Epithelial CellsAnionsAntioxidantsApoptosisBiological TransportCationsCell LineCell ShapeCell SurvivalDose-Response Relationship, DrugGlutathione DisulfideHumansMacrophages, AlveolarMitochondriaAnionsAntioxidantsCationsDrug CarriersGlutathione DisulfidePolystyrenesReactive Oxygen Species

Identifiers

PMID26133975
PMCPMC4489088
OpenAlexW1795585523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.