ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2016
Impact of electronic diabetes registry 'Meaningful Use' on quality of care and hospital utilization.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Role of Physician and Practice Characteristics in the Quality of Diabetes Management in Primary Care: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of general internal medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Health outcomes measurement and organizational readiness support quality improvement: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2018Pooled it
- Impact of clinical registries on quality of patient care and clinical outcomes: A systematic review.PloS one · 2017Pooled it
- Supporting primary care clinicians in caring for patients with alcohol use disorder: study protocol for Records for Alcohol Care Enhancement (RACE), a factorial four-arm randomized trial.Addiction science & clinical practice · 2025Article
- Children's and young People's diabetes services: What works well and what doesn't?Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Global eHealth capacity: secondary analysis of WHO data on eHealth and implications for kidney care delivery in low-resource settings.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Registry-Managed Care Coordination and Education for Patients With Co-occurring Diabetes and Serious Mental Illness.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2021Observational
- Profile and factors associated with glycaemic control of patients with type 2 diabetes in Greece: results from the diabetes registry.BMC endocrine disorders · 2020Observational
- The Effectiveness of Health Care Information Technologies: Evaluation of Trust, Security Beliefs, and Privacy as Determinants of Health Care Outcomes.Journal of medical Internet research · 2018Article
- Global coverage of health information systems for kidney disease: availability, challenges, and opportunities for development.Kidney international supplements · 2018Review
- Adherence to quality of care measurements among 58,182 patients with new onset diabetes and its association with mortality.PloS one · 2018Article
- Development of a Web-Based Registry to Support Diabetes Care in Free Medical Clinics.Perspectives in health information managemen · 2017Article
- Improving the quality of EHR recording in primary care: a data quality feedback tool.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2017Article
- [Influence of registries on the quality of care].Der Unfallchirurg · 2016Review
- Impact of clinical registries on quality of patient care and health outcomes: protocol for a systematic review.BMJ open · 2016Article
- Harnessing the power of longitudinal data.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate whether the use of diabetes registries meeting Meaningful Use core objectives in primary care practices is associated with differences in quality of care and hospital utilization rates. MATERIALS AND
methodsA practice assessment survey was conducted to identify whether and how practices were using diabetes registries. Insurance claims data from 2010 were used to compare the health outcomes of patients from practices that used diabetes registries meeting Meaningful Use-related objectives to the outcomes of patients from other practices. Logistic hierarchical linear modeling was used to analyze the data.
resultsRecords from 12,514 diabetic patients (including 10,809 with type 2 diabetes) from 50 urban practices were included in the analysis. The results suggest that patients with type 2 diabetes who were treated in practices using registries for patient reminders were more likely to have completed the recommended laboratory testing (odds ratio [OR] 1.26, p < 0.01) and dilated retinal examinations (OR 1.14, p < 0.01). Patients in practices using registries for quality improvement were less likely to have 'avoidable hospitalization' (OR 0.83, p < 0.01) and emergency room visits (OR 0.76, p < 0.01). The use of a diabetes registry did not have a significant impact on the quality of care or hospital utilization for patients with type 1 diabetes.
conclusionUse of diabetes registries meeting Meaningful Use core objectives is associated with higher completion or recommended lab tests and a lower hospital utilization rate for patients with type 2 diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.