Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26133894›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2016

Preparing a collection of radiology examinations for distribution and retrieval.

Dina Demner-Fushman, Marc D Kohli, Marc B Rosenman, Sonya E Shooshan, Laritza Rodriguez, Sameer Antani, George R Thoma, Clement J McDonald

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 171 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
171citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

171 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Autodidactic dense anatomical models.Medical image analysis · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. ArXiv · 2026
    Article

111 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dina Demner-FushmanStaff Scientist, Lister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health Bldg. 38A, Room 10S-1022, 8600 Rockville Pike MSC-3824 Bethesda, MD 20894, USA ddemner@mail.nih.gov.
Marc D KohliAssistant Professor, Director of Informatics, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Marc B RosenmanAssociate Professor, Children's Health Services Research, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Sonya E ShooshanComputer Science Branch, Lister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA.
Laritza RodriguezComputer Science Branch, Lister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA.
Sameer AntaniStaff Scientist, Communications Engineering Branch, Lister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA.
George R ThomaBranch Chief, Communications Engineering Branch, Lister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA.
Clement J McDonaldDirector, Lister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA.

Funding

NLM's Personal Health Record and Consumer Service R&DZIALM008925 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI MCDONALD, CLEMENT · 2009 to 2020
$11.8M
Integrating image and text information for biomedical information retrieval ZIALM010001 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI DEMNER-FUSHMAN, DINA · 2010 to 2020
$6.0M
Using large Clinical Data bases to assess the association between patient factors, medication usage and patient outcomesZIALM008927 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI MCDONALD, CLEMENT · 2009 to 2015
$1.5M
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveClinical documents made available for secondary use play an increasingly important role in discovery of clinical knowledge, development of research methods, and education. An important step in facilitating secondary use of clinical document collections is easy access to descriptions and samples that represent the content of the collections. This paper presents an approach to developing a collection of radiology examinations, including both the images and radiologist narrative reports, and making them publicly available in a searchable database. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe authors collected 3996 radiology reports from the Indiana Network for Patient Care and 8121 associated images from the hospitals' picture archiving systems. The images and reports were de-identified automatically and then the automatic de-identification was manually verified. The authors coded the key findings of the reports and empirically assessed the benefits of manual coding on retrieval.

resultsThe automatic de-identification of the narrative was aggressive and achieved 100% precision at the cost of rendering a few findings uninterpretable. Automatic de-identification of images was not quite as perfect. Images for two of 3996 patients (0.05%) showed protected health information. Manual encoding of findings improved retrieval precision.

conclusionStringent de-identification methods can remove all identifiers from text radiology reports. DICOM de-identification of images does not remove all identifying information and needs special attention to images scanned from film. Adding manual coding to the radiologist narrative reports significantly improved relevancy of the retrieved clinical documents. The de-identified Indiana chest X-ray collection is available for searching and downloading from the National Library of Medicine (http://openi.nlm.nih.gov/).

Indexed as

Data AnonymizationRadiography, ThoracicRadiology Information SystemsHumansInformation Storage and Retrievalabstracting and indexingbiometric identificationinformation storage and retrievalmedical recordsradiography

Identifiers

PMID26133894
PMCPMC5009925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.