Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26133615›Full record

Trial reportMedical physics2015

Parenchymal texture analysis in digital mammography: A fully automated pipeline for breast cancer risk assessment.

Yuanjie Zheng, Brad M Keller, Shonket Ray, Yan Wang, Emily F Conant, James C Gee, Despina Kontos

Abstract readClinical TrialValidation Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medical physics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Association between Participant Characteristics and Breast Parenchymal Texture Variation among Postmenopausal Women.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Artificial Intelligence in Breast X-Ray Imaging.Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Novel Radiomic Measurements of Tumor-Associated Vasculature Morphology on Clinical Imaging as a Biomarker of Treatment Response in Multiple Cancers.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yuanjie ZhengDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3600 Market Street, Suite 370, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104.
Brad M KellerDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3600 Market Street, Suite 370, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104.
Shonket RayDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3600 Market Street, Suite 370, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104.
Yan WangDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3600 Market Street, Suite 370, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104.
Emily F ConantDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3600 Market Street, Suite 370, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104.
James C GeeDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3600 Market Street, Suite 370, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104.
Despina KontosDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3600 Market Street, Suite 370, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104.

Funding

Penn Center for Innovation in Personalized Breast ScreeningU54CA163313 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ARMSTRONG, KATRINA, SCHNALL, MITCHELL D. · 2011 to 2017
$7.4M
Effect of Breast Density on Screening Recall with Digital Breast TomosynthesisR01CA161749 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KONTOS, DESPINA · 2012 to 2021
$3.6M
NCI NIH HHS 5R01CA161749-02NCI NIH HHS R01 CA161749NCI NIH HHS U54 CA163313NCI NIH HHS U54CA163313-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMammographic percent density (PD%) is known to be a strong risk factor for breast cancer. Recent studies also suggest that parenchymal texture features, which are more granular descriptors of the parenchymal pattern, can provide additional information about breast cancer risk. To date, most studies have measured mammographic texture within selected regions of interest (ROIs) in the breast, which cannot adequately capture the complexity of the parenchymal pattern throughout the whole breast. To better characterize patterns of the parenchymal tissue, the authors have developed a fully automated software pipeline based on a novel lattice-based strategy to extract a range of parenchymal texture features from the entire breast region.

methodsDigital mammograms from 106 cases with 318 age-matched controls were retrospectively analyzed. The lattice-based approach is based on a regular grid virtually overlaid on each mammographic image. Texture features are computed from the intersection (i.e., lattice) points of the grid lines within the breast, using a local window centered at each lattice point. Using this strategy, a range of statistical (gray-level histogram, co-occurrence, and run-length) and structural (edge-enhancing, local binary pattern, and fractal dimension) features are extracted. To cover the entire breast, the size of the local window for feature extraction is set equal to the lattice grid spacing and optimized experimentally by evaluating different windows sizes. The association between their lattice-based texture features and breast cancer was evaluated using logistic regression with leave-one-out cross validation and further compared to that of breast PD% and commonly used single-ROI texture features extracted from the retroareolar or the central breast region. Classification performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC). DeLong's test was used to compare the different ROCs in terms of AUC performance.

resultsThe average univariate performance of the lattice-based features is higher when extracted from smaller than larger window sizes. While not every individual texture feature is superior to breast PD% (AUC: 0.59, STD: 0.03), their combination in multivariate analysis has significantly better performance (AUC: 0.85, STD: 0.02, p < 0.001). The lattice-based texture features also outperform the single-ROI texture features when extracted from the retroareolar or the central breast region (AUC: 0.60-0.74, STD: 0.03). Adding breast PD% does not make a significant performance improvement to the lattice-based texture features or the single-ROI features (p > 0.05).

conclusionsThe proposed lattice-based strategy for mammographic texture analysis enables to characterize the parenchymal pattern over the entire breast. As such, these features provide richer information compared to currently used descriptors and may ultimately improve breast cancer risk assessment. Larger studies are warranted to validate these findings and also compare to standard demographic and reproductive risk factors.

Indexed as

SoftwareArea Under CurveBreastBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedLogistic ModelsMammographyMultivariate AnalysisPattern Recognition, AutomatedRetrospective StudiesRiskROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID26133615
PMCPMC4474947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.