Trial reportMedical physics2015
Parenchymal texture analysis in digital mammography: A fully automated pipeline for breast cancer risk assessment.
Trial report in Medical physics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed.
- DCE-MRI and Mammography integrated radiomic analysis in triple negative ductal invasive breast cancer patients. Comparison between BRCA and not BRCA mutated patients: preliminary results.European journal of radiology open · 2026Article
- Development and internal validation of mammography feature-based prognostic models for distant recurrence-free survival of invasive breast cancer in a screening cohort.NPJ breast cancer · 2026Article
- Association between Participant Characteristics and Breast Parenchymal Texture Variation among Postmenopausal Women.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026Article
- Associations of early-adulthood adiposity with breast parenchymal tissue complexity within premenopausal women.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025Article
- Comparison of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Mammography-based Radiomics for Breast Cancer Risk Assessment: Case-Control Study.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2025Article
- A Machine Learning Model Based on Global Mammographic Radiomic Features Can Predict Which Normal Mammographic Cases Radiology Trainees Find Most Difficult.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Development of radiomics-based models on mammograms with mass lesions to predict prognostically relevant characteristics of invasive breast cancer in a screening cohort.British journal of cancer · 2025Article
- Radiomic Parenchymal Phenotypes of Breast Texture from Mammography and Association with Risk of Breast Cancer.Radiology · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based breast region segmentation in raw and processed digital mammograms: generalization across views and vendors.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2024Article
- Predicting Breast Cancer Risk Using Radiomics Features of Mammography Images.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Global Radiomic Features from Mammography for Predicting Difficult-To-Interpret Normal Cases.Journal of digital imaging · 2023Article
- Using Radiomics-Based Machine Learning to Create Targeted Test Sets to Improve Specific Mammography Reader Cohort Performance: A Feasibility Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Beyond Breast Density: Risk Measures for Breast Cancer in Multiple Imaging Modalities.Radiology · 2023Review
- Radiomic phenotyping of the lung parenchyma in a lung cancer screening cohort.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Breast X-Ray Imaging.Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR · 2023Review
- Machine Learning Approaches with Textural Features to Calculate Breast Density on Mammography.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Article
- Deep learning of longitudinal mammogram examinations for breast cancer risk prediction.Pattern recognition · 2022Article
- Novel Radiomic Measurements of Tumor-Associated Vasculature Morphology on Clinical Imaging as a Biomarker of Treatment Response in Multiple Cancers.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022Article
- AI in Breast Cancer Imaging: A Survey of Different Applications.Journal of imaging · 2022Review
- Radiomics in photon-counting dedicated breast CT: potential of texture analysis for breast density classification.European radiology experimental · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeMammographic percent density (PD%) is known to be a strong risk factor for breast cancer. Recent studies also suggest that parenchymal texture features, which are more granular descriptors of the parenchymal pattern, can provide additional information about breast cancer risk. To date, most studies have measured mammographic texture within selected regions of interest (ROIs) in the breast, which cannot adequately capture the complexity of the parenchymal pattern throughout the whole breast. To better characterize patterns of the parenchymal tissue, the authors have developed a fully automated software pipeline based on a novel lattice-based strategy to extract a range of parenchymal texture features from the entire breast region.
methodsDigital mammograms from 106 cases with 318 age-matched controls were retrospectively analyzed. The lattice-based approach is based on a regular grid virtually overlaid on each mammographic image. Texture features are computed from the intersection (i.e., lattice) points of the grid lines within the breast, using a local window centered at each lattice point. Using this strategy, a range of statistical (gray-level histogram, co-occurrence, and run-length) and structural (edge-enhancing, local binary pattern, and fractal dimension) features are extracted. To cover the entire breast, the size of the local window for feature extraction is set equal to the lattice grid spacing and optimized experimentally by evaluating different windows sizes. The association between their lattice-based texture features and breast cancer was evaluated using logistic regression with leave-one-out cross validation and further compared to that of breast PD% and commonly used single-ROI texture features extracted from the retroareolar or the central breast region. Classification performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC). DeLong's test was used to compare the different ROCs in terms of AUC performance.
resultsThe average univariate performance of the lattice-based features is higher when extracted from smaller than larger window sizes. While not every individual texture feature is superior to breast PD% (AUC: 0.59, STD: 0.03), their combination in multivariate analysis has significantly better performance (AUC: 0.85, STD: 0.02, p < 0.001). The lattice-based texture features also outperform the single-ROI texture features when extracted from the retroareolar or the central breast region (AUC: 0.60-0.74, STD: 0.03). Adding breast PD% does not make a significant performance improvement to the lattice-based texture features or the single-ROI features (p > 0.05).
conclusionsThe proposed lattice-based strategy for mammographic texture analysis enables to characterize the parenchymal pattern over the entire breast. As such, these features provide richer information compared to currently used descriptors and may ultimately improve breast cancer risk assessment. Larger studies are warranted to validate these findings and also compare to standard demographic and reproductive risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.