Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26133479›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2015

Using local lexicalized rules to identify heart disease risk factors in clinical notes.

George Karystianis, Azad Dehghan, Aleksandar Kovacevic, John A Keane, Goran Nenadic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Clinical trial cohort selection based on multi-level rule-based natural language processing system.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Automatic mining of symptom severity from psychiatric evaluation notes.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

George KarystianisSchool of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Azad DehghanSchool of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Aleksandar KovacevicFaculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.
John A KeaneSchool of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, University of Manchester, UK.
Goran NenadicSchool of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Health eResearch Centre, The Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research, Manchester, UK; Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, University of Manchester, UK. Electronic address: g.nenadic@manchester.ac.uk.

Funding

Challenges in Natural Language Processing in Clinical TextR13LM011411 · NLM · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY · PI UZUNER, OZLEM · 2012 to 2016
$98k
Medical Research Council MC_PC_13042Medical Research Council MR/K006665/1NLM NIH HHS R13 LM011411
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart disease is the leading cause of death globally and a significant part of the human population lives with it. A number of risk factors have been recognized as contributing to the disease, including obesity, coronary artery disease (CAD), hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, smoking, and family history of premature CAD. This paper describes and evaluates a methodology to extract mentions of such risk factors from diabetic clinical notes, which was a task of the i2b2/UTHealth 2014 Challenge in Natural Language Processing for Clinical Data. The methodology is knowledge-driven and the system implements local lexicalized rules (based on syntactical patterns observed in notes) combined with manually constructed dictionaries that characterize the domain. A part of the task was also to detect the time interval in which the risk factors were present in a patient. The system was applied to an evaluation set of 514 unseen notes and achieved a micro-average F-score of 88% (with 86% precision and 90% recall). While the identification of CAD family history, medication and some of the related disease factors (e.g. hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia) showed quite good results, the identification of CAD-specific indicators proved to be more challenging (F-score of 74%). Overall, the results are encouraging and suggested that automated text mining methods can be used to process clinical notes to identify risk factors and monitor progression of heart disease on a large-scale, providing necessary data for clinical and epidemiological studies.

Indexed as

NarrationNatural Language ProcessingAgedCardiovascular DiseasesCohort StudiesComorbidityComputer SecurityConfidentialityData MiningDiabetes ComplicationsElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansIncidenceLongitudinal StudiesMaleHeart diseaseRisk factorsRule-based modellingText miningVocabularies

Identifiers

PMID26133479
PMCPMC4974302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.