ReviewJournal of functional biomaterials2015
Magnetically Targeted Stem Cell Delivery for Regenerative Medicine.
Review in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bioenzymatic single-cell microencapsulation for enhanced stem Cell therapy.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Avenues for optimization of cardiac therapeutics by minimally invasive delivery.Acta biomaterialia · 2026Review
- Exosomes from young plasma stimulate the osteogenic differentiation and prevent osteoporosis via miR-142-5p.Bioactive materials · 2025Article
- Cell-Based Therapies: Ferromagnetic Versus Superparamagnetic Cell Targeting.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Magnetic Cell Targeting for Cardiovascular Tissue Engineering.Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews · 2025Review
- Immunomagnetic Delivery of Adipose-Derived Endothelial Progenitor Cells for the Repair of Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in a Rat Model.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Stem cell-nanomedicine system as a theranostic bio-gadolinium agent for targeted neutron capture cancer therapy.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Combined use of magnetic microbeads for endothelial cell isolation and enhanced cell engraftment in myocardial repair.Theranostics · 2023Article
- Optimization of Multimodal Nanoparticles Internalization Process in Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Cell Therapy Studies.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Chemotherapeutic nanomaterials in tumor boundary delineation: Prospects for effective tumor treatment.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2022Review
- Optical Microscopy Systems for the Detection of Unlabeled Nanoparticles.International journal of nanomedicine · 2022Review
- In Vitro Evaluation of Hyperthermia Magnetic Technique Indicating the Best Strategy for Internalization of Magnetic Nanoparticles Applied in Glioblastoma Tumor Cells.Pharmaceutics · 2021Article
- Bioengineering Technologies for Cardiac Regenerative Medicine.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Review
- Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles: Cytotoxicity, Metabolism, and Cellular Behavior in Biomedicine Applications.International journal of nanomedicine · 2021Review
- Magnetic targeting increases mesenchymal stromal cell retention in lungs and enhances beneficial effects on pulmonary damage in experimental silicosis.Stem cells translational medicine · 2020Article
- Mesenchymal stem cells-derived and siRNAs-encapsulated exosomes inhibit osteonecrosis of the femoral head.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2020Article
- Prospect of Different Types of Magnetic Nanoparticles in Stem Cell Therapy.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2020Review
- Engineered iron oxide nanoparticles to improve regenerative effects of mesenchymal stem cells.Biomedical engineering letters · 2020Review
- Engineering better stem cell therapies for treating heart diseases.Annals of translational medicine · 2020Review
- Mesenchymal stem cells proliferation and remote manipulation upon exposure to magnetic semiconductor nanoparticles.Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Stem cells play a special role in the body as agents of self-renewal and auto-reparation for tissues and organs. Stem cell therapies represent a promising alternative strategy to regenerate damaged tissue when natural repairing and conventional pharmacological intervention fail to do so. A fundamental impediment for the evolution of stem cell therapies has been the difficulty of effectively targeting administered stem cells to the disease foci. Biocompatible magnetically responsive nanoparticles are being utilized for the targeted delivery of stem cells in order to enhance their retention in the desired treatment site. This noninvasive treatment-localization strategy has shown promising results and has the potential to mitigate the problem of poor long-term stem cell engraftment in a number of organ systems post-delivery. In addition, these same nanoparticles can be used to track and monitor the cells in vivo, using magnetic resonance imaging. In the present review we underline the principles of magnetic targeting for stem cell delivery, with a look at the logic behind magnetic nanoparticle systems, their manufacturing and design variants, and their applications in various pathological models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.