Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26132979›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational and environmental hygiene2015

Systems Biology and Biomarkers of Early Effects for Occupational Exposure Limit Setting.

D Gayle DeBord, Lyle Burgoon, Stephen W Edwards, Lynne T Haber, M Helen Kanitz, Eileen Kuempel, Russell S Thomas, Berran Yucesoy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

D Gayle DeBorda National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Division of Applied Research and Technology , Cincinnati , Ohio.
Lyle Burgoonb U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park , North Carolina.
Stephen W Edwardsb U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park , North Carolina.
Lynne T Haberc Toxicology Excellence for Risk Assessment (TERA) , Cincinnati , Ohio.
M Helen Kanitza National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Division of Applied Research and Technology , Cincinnati , Ohio.
Eileen Kuempeld National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Education and Information Division , Cincinnati , Ohio.
Russell S Thomasb U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park , North Carolina.
Berran Yucesoyf National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Heath Effects Laboratory Division , Morgantown , West Virginia.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a recent National Research Council document, new strategies for risk assessment were described to enable more accurate and quicker assessments. This report suggested that evaluating individual responses through increased use of bio-monitoring could improve dose-response estimations. Identification of specific biomarkers may be useful for diagnostics or risk prediction as they have the potential to improve exposure assessments. This paper discusses systems biology, biomarkers of effect, and computational toxicology approaches and their relevance to the occupational exposure limit setting process. The systems biology approach evaluates the integration of biological processes and how disruption of these processes by chemicals or other hazards affects disease outcomes. This type of approach could provide information used in delineating the mode of action of the response or toxicity, and may be useful to define the low adverse and no adverse effect levels. Biomarkers of effect are changes measured in biological systems and are considered to be preclinical in nature. Advances in computational methods and experimental -omics methods that allow the simultaneous measurement of families of macromolecules such as DNA, RNA, and proteins in a single analysis have made these systems approaches feasible for broad application. The utility of the information for risk assessments from -omics approaches has shown promise and can provide information on mode of action and dose-response relationships. As these techniques evolve, estimation of internal dose and response biomarkers will be a critical test of these new technologies for application in risk assessment strategies. While proof of concept studies have been conducted that provide evidence of their value, challenges with standardization and harmonization still need to be overcome before these methods are used routinely.

Indexed as

BiomarkersDose-Response Relationship, DrugEnvironmental MonitoringHumansOccupational ExposureRisk AssessmentSystems BiologyToxicologyBiomarkersbiomarkersdose-responseexposure assessmentoccupationalrisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID26132979
PMCPMC4654673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.