Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26132815›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Using fMRI to Investigate Memory in Young Children Born Small for Gestational Age.

Henrica M A de Bie, Michiel B de Ruiter, Mieke Ouwendijk, Kim J Oostrom, Marko Wilke, Maria Boersma, Dick J Veltman, Henriette A Delemarre-van de Waal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Clinical application of advanced MR methods in children: points to consider.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2018
    Review
  8. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Henrica M A de BieDepartment of Pediatrics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Michiel B de RuiterDepartment of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mieke OuwendijkDepartment of Pediatric Psychology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Kim J OostromDepartment of Pediatric Psychology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marko WilkeDepartment of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Medicine and Experimental Pediatric Neuroimaging Neuroimaging Group, Children's Hospital, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Maria BoersmaDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dick J VeltmanDepartment of Psychiatry, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Henriette A Delemarre-van de WaalDepartment of Pediatrics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIntrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) can lead to infants being born small for gestational age (SGA). SGA is associated with differences in brain anatomy and impaired cognition. We investigated learning and memory in children born SGA using neuropsychological testing and functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI). STUDY

design18 children born appropriate for gestational age (AGA) and 34 SGA born children (18 with and 16 without postnatal catch-up growth) participated in this study. All children were between 4 and 7 years old. Cognitive functioning was assessed by IQ and memory testing (Digit/Word Span and Location Learning). A newly developed fMRI picture encoding task was completed by all children in order to assess brain regions involved in memory processes.

resultsNeuropsychological testing demonstrated that SGA children had IQ's within the normal range but lower than in AGA and poorer performances across measures of memory. Using fMRI, we observed memory related activity in posterior parahippocampal gyrus as well as the hippocampus proper. Additionally, activation was seen bilaterally in the prefrontal gyrus. Children born SGA showed less activation in the left parahippocampal region compared to AGA.

conclusionsThis is the first fMRI study demonstrating different brain activation patterns in 4-7 year old children born SGA, suggesting that intrauterine growth restriction continues to affect neural functioning in children later-on.

Indexed as

Infant, Small for Gestational AgeMagnetic Resonance ImagingMemoryBirth WeightBrainBrain MappingChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGestational AgeHumansLearningLongitudinal StudiesMaleNeuropsychological Tests

Identifiers

PMID26132815
PMCPMC4488594
OpenAlexW1533018301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.