Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26132782›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2015

Seeking signatures of reinforcement at the genetic level: a hitchhiking mapping and candidate gene approach in the house mouse.

Carole M Smadja, Etienne Loire, Pierre Caminade, Marios Thoma, Yasmin Latour, Camille Roux, Michaela Thoss, Dustin J Penn, Guila Ganem, Pierre Boursot

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Do genetic loci that cause reproductive isolation in the lab inhibit gene flow in nature?Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2024
    Article
  4. Genomic analysis of the rhesus macaque (Ecology and evolution · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The role of copy-number variation in the reinforcement of sexual isolation between the two European subspecies of the house mouse.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Carole M Smadja *Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution UMR 5554 (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique CNRS, Institut pour la Recherche et le Développement IRD, Université de Montpellier), cc065 Université de Montpellier, Campus Triolet, 34095 Montpellier, France.
Etienne Loire *Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution UMR 5554 (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique CNRS, Institut pour la Recherche et le Développement IRD, Université de Montpellier), cc065 Université de Montpellier, Campus Triolet, 34095 Montpellier, France.
Pierre CaminadeInstitut des Sciences de l'Evolution UMR 5554 (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique CNRS, Institut pour la Recherche et le Développement IRD, Université de Montpellier), cc065 Université de Montpellier, Campus Triolet, 34095 Montpellier, France.
Marios ThomaInstitut des Sciences de l'Evolution UMR 5554 (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique CNRS, Institut pour la Recherche et le Développement IRD, Université de Montpellier), cc065 Université de Montpellier, Campus Triolet, 34095 Montpellier, France.
Yasmin LatourInstitut des Sciences de l'Evolution UMR 5554 (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique CNRS, Institut pour la Recherche et le Développement IRD, Université de Montpellier), cc065 Université de Montpellier, Campus Triolet, 34095 Montpellier, France.
Camille RouxInstitut des Sciences de l'Evolution UMR 5554 (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique CNRS, Institut pour la Recherche et le Développement IRD, Université de Montpellier), cc065 Université de Montpellier, Campus Triolet, 34095 Montpellier, France.
Michaela ThossUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Konrad Lorenz Institute of Ethology, Department of Integrative Biology and Evolution, Vienna, Austria.
Dustin J PennUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Konrad Lorenz Institute of Ethology, Department of Integrative Biology and Evolution, Vienna, Austria.
Guila GanemInstitut des Sciences de l'Evolution UMR 5554 (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique CNRS, Institut pour la Recherche et le Développement IRD, Université de Montpellier), cc065 Université de Montpellier, Campus Triolet, 34095 Montpellier, France.
Pierre BoursotInstitut des Sciences de l'Evolution UMR 5554 (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique CNRS, Institut pour la Recherche et le Développement IRD, Université de Montpellier), cc065 Université de Montpellier, Campus Triolet, 34095 Montpellier, France.
Université de Montpellier · FRInstitut des Sciences de l'Evolution de Montpellier · FRKonrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research · ATCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 24711
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reinforcement is the process by which prezygotic isolation is strengthened as a response to selection against hybridization. Most empirical support for reinforcement comes from the observation of its possible phenotypic signature: an accentuated degree of prezygotic isolation in the hybrid zone as compared to allopatry. Here, we implemented a novel approach to this question by seeking for the signature of reinforcement at the genetic level. In the house mouse, selection against hybrids and enhanced olfactory-based assortative mate preferences are observed in a hybrid zone between the two European subspecies Mus musculus musculus and M. m. domesticus, suggesting a possible recent reinforcement event. To test for the genetic signature of reinforcing selection and identify genes involved in sexual isolation, we adopted a hitchhiking mapping approach targeting genomic regions containing candidate genes for assortative mating in mice. We densely scanned these genomic regions in hybrid zone and allopatric samples using a large number of fast evolving microsatellite loci that allow the detection of recent selection events. We found a handful of loci showing the expected pattern of significant reduction in variability in populations close to the hybrid zone, showing assortative odour preference in mate choice experiments as compared to populations further away and displaying no such preference. These loci lie close to genes that we pinpoint as testable candidates for further investigation.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationHybridization, GeneticMating Preference, AnimalSelection, GeneticAnimalsAustriaDenmarkFemaleGenomeGenomicsMaleMiceMicrosatellite RepeatsOdorantsPhenotypeSequence Analysis, DNAgenomicshybrid zonemajor urinary proteinselective sweepspeciationvomeronasal receptor

Identifiers

PMID26132782
PMCPMC4990122
OpenAlexW2127861522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.