Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26132716›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2015

Sustained versus standard inflations during neonatal resuscitation to prevent mortality and improve respiratory outcomes.

Colm P F O'Donnell, Matteo Bruschettini, Peter G Davis, Colin J Morley, Lorenzo Moja, Maria Grazia Calevo, Simona Zappettini

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Continuous Chest Compressions During Sustained Inflations in a Perinatal Asphyxial Cardiac Arrest Lamb Model.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2017
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Colm P F O'DonnellDepartment of Neonatology, National Maternity Hospital, Holles Street, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Matteo Bruschettini
Peter G Davis
Colin J Morley
Lorenzo Moja
Maria Grazia Calevo
Simona Zappettini
Istituto Giannina Gaslini · ITLund University · SENational Maternity Hospital · IERegione LiguriaThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAt birth, infants' lungs are fluid-filled; this fluid must be replaced by air to allow for effective breathing. Some infants are judged to have inadequate breathing at birth and are resuscitated with positive pressure ventilation (PPV). Giving prolonged (sustained) inflations at the start of PPV may help clear lung fluid and establish gas volume in the lungs.

objectivesTo assess the efficacy of initial sustained (> one second duration) lung inflation compared to standard inflations (≤ one second) in newly born infants receiving resuscitation with intermittent PPV. SEARCH

methodsWe searched on PubMed (1966 to 1 February 2015), EMBASE (1980 to 1 February 2015) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (the Cochrane Library 2015). No language restrictions were applied. We searched the abstracts of the Pediatric Academic Societies (PAS) from 2000 to 2014. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing giving initial sustained lung inflations (SLI) vs. standard inflations to infants receiving resuscitation with PPV at birth. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We assessed methodological quality of the included trials using Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group (EPOC) criteria (assessing randomisation, blinding, loss to follow-up and handling of outcome data). We evaluated the treatment effect using a fixed-effect model using risk ratio for categorical data and using mean, standard deviation (SD) and weighted mean difference (WMD) for continuous data. MAIN

resultsTwo trials enrolling 352 infants met our inclusion criteria. There were no differences in the rates of mortality during hospitalisation (RR 1.59, 95% CI 0.81 to 3.10; two trials, 352 infants), intubation in the first three days of life (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.02; two trials, 352 infants) or chronic lung disease (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.42; two trials, 349 infants) between infants who received sustained versus standard inflations. The rate of patent ductus arteriosus (reported as need for pharmacological treatment) was higher in the sustained inflation group (RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.56; two trials, 352 infants). AUTHORS'

conclusionsAt present there is insufficient evidence from clinical trials to determine the efficacy and safety of initial sustained lung inflation for newborn infants resuscitated with PPV. RCTs comparing PPV with and without sustained inflations at neonatal resuscitation are warranted.

Indexed as

Ductus Arteriosus, PatentHospital MortalityHumansInfant, NewbornIntubation, IntratrachealPositive-Pressure RespirationPulmonary SurfactantsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResuscitationTime FactorsPulmonary Surfactants

Identifiers

PMID26132716
OpenAlexW4252871970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.