Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26132533›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2015

Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Based Developmental Toxicity Assays for Chemical Safety Screening and Systems Biology Data Generation.

Vaibhav Shinde, Stefanie Klima, Perumal Srinivasan Sureshkumar, Kesavan Meganathan, Smita Jagtap, Eugen Rempel, Jörg Rahnenführer, Jan Georg Hengstler, Tanja Waldmann, Jürgen Hescheler and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Advances in Cytotoxicity Testing: From In Vitro Assays to In Silico Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  2. Optimization of the TeraTox Assay for Preclinical Teratogenicity Assessment.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Stem cell-based test methods.EXCLI journal · 2019
    Article
  9. Performance metrics ofEXCLI journal · 2019
    Article
  10. Pluripotent Stem Cells in Developmental Toxicity Testing: A Review of Methodological Advances.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Vaibhav ShindeCenter of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Institute of Neurophysiology, University of Cologne.
Stefanie KlimaDepartment of Biology, University of Konstanz.
Perumal Srinivasan SureshkumarCenter of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Institute of Neurophysiology, University of Cologne.
Kesavan MeganathanCenter of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Institute of Neurophysiology, University of Cologne.
Smita JagtapCenter of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Institute of Neurophysiology, University of Cologne.
Eugen RempelDepartment of Statistics, Technical University of Dortmund.
Jörg RahnenführerDepartment of Statistics, Technical University of Dortmund.
Jan Georg HengstlerLeibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Technical University of Dortmund.
Tanja WaldmannDepartment of Biology, University of Konstanz.
Jürgen HeschelerCenter of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Institute of Neurophysiology, University of Cologne.
Marcel LeistDepartment of Biology, University of Konstanz.
Agapios SachinidisCenter of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Institute of Neurophysiology, University of Cologne; a.sachinidis@uni-koeln.de.
University of Cologne · DETU Dortmund University · DEUniversity of Konstanz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficient protocols to differentiate human pluripotent stem cells to various tissues in combination with -omics technologies opened up new horizons for in vitro toxicity testing of potential drugs. To provide a solid scientific basis for such assays, it will be important to gain quantitative information on the time course of development and on the underlying regulatory mechanisms by systems biology approaches. Two assays have therefore been tuned here for these requirements. In the UKK test system, human embryonic stem cells (hESC) (or other pluripotent cells) are left to spontaneously differentiate for 14 days in embryoid bodies, to allow generation of cells of all three germ layers. This system recapitulates key steps of early human embryonic development, and it can predict human-specific early embryonic toxicity/teratogenicity, if cells are exposed to chemicals during differentiation. The UKN1 test system is based on hESC differentiating to a population of neuroectodermal progenitor (NEP) cells for 6 days. This system recapitulates early neural development and predicts early developmental neurotoxicity and epigenetic changes triggered by chemicals. Both systems, in combination with transcriptome microarray studies, are suitable for identifying toxicity biomarkers. Moreover, they may be used in combination to generate input data for systems biology analysis. These test systems have advantages over the traditional toxicological studies requiring large amounts of animals. The test systems may contribute to a reduction of the costs for drug development and chemical safety evaluation. Their combination sheds light especially on compounds that may influence neurodevelopment specifically.

Indexed as

Animal Testing AlternativesHumansPluripotent Stem CellsSystems BiologyToxicity Tests

Identifiers

PMID26132533
PMCPMC4544843
OpenAlexW644986298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.