Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26132307›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Tuberculosis Biomarker Extraction and Isothermal Amplification in an Integrated Diagnostic Device.

Amy Creecy, Patricia K Russ, Francesca Solinas, David W Wright, Frederick R Haselton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [Visualized detection for mycobacterium tuberculosis using loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2017
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amy CreecyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
Patricia K RussDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
Francesca SolinasDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
David W WrightDepartment of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
Frederick R HaseltonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States of America; Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States of America.

Funding

Vanderbilt-Zambia Network for Innovation in Global Health TechnologiesD43TW009348 · FIC · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI HASELTON, FREDERICK R, HEIMBURGER, DOUGLAS CORBETT · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009348
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we integrated magnetic bead-based sample preparation and isothermal loop mediated amplification (LAMP) of TB in a single tube. Surrogate sputum samples produced by the Program for Appropriate Technology in Health containing inactivated TB bacteria were used to test the diagnostic. In order to test the sample preparation method, samples were lysed, and DNA was manually extracted and eluted into water in the tube. In a thermal cycler, LAMP amplified TB DNA from 103 TB cells/mL of sputum at 53.5 ± 3.3 minutes, 104 cells/mL at 46.3 ± 2.2 minutes, and 105 cells/mL at 41.6 ± 1.9 minutes. Negative control samples did not amplify. Next, sample preparation was combined with in-tubing isothermal LAMP amplification by replacing the water elution chamber with a LAMP reaction chamber. In this intermediate configuration, LAMP amplified 103 cells/mL at 74 ± 10 minutes, 104 cells/mL at 60 ± 9 minutes, and 105 TB cells/mL of sputum at 54 ± 9 minutes. Two of three negative controls did not amplify; one amplified at 100 minutes. In the semi-automated system, DNA was eluted directly into an isothermal reaction solution containing the faster OptiGene DNA polymerase. The low surrogate sputum concentration, 103 TB cells/mL, amplified at 52.8 ± 3.3 minutes, 104 cells/mL at 45.4 ± 11.3 minutes, and 105 cells/mL at 31.8 ± 2.9 minutes. TB negative samples amplified at 66.4 ± 7.4 minutes. This study demonstrated the feasibility of a single tube design for integrating sample preparation and isothermal amplification, which with further development could be useful for point-of-care applications, particularly in a low-resource setting.

Indexed as

DNA, BacterialMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMycobacterium tuberculosisPolymerase Chain ReactionSputumDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID26132307
PMCPMC4488445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.