Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26132117›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2015

Establishment of a Clinically Relevant Ex Vivo Mock Cataract Surgery Model for Investigating Epithelial Wound Repair in a Native Microenvironment.

Janice L Walker, Brigid M Bleaken, Iris M Wolff, A Sue Menko

Open access · bronzeAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Resident immune cells of the avascular lens: Mediators of the injury and fibrotic response of the lens.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2021
    Article
  11. Fibrosis: Shared Lessons From the Lens and Cornea.Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Janice L WalkerPathology, Anatomy and Cell Biology, Thomas Jefferson University; Janice.l.Walker@jefferson.edu.
Brigid M BleakenPathology, Anatomy and Cell Biology, Thomas Jefferson University.
Iris M WolffPathology, Anatomy and Cell Biology, Thomas Jefferson University.
A Sue MenkoPathology, Anatomy and Cell Biology, Thomas Jefferson University.
Thomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

Paradigms of Wound Healing and Fibrosis in the EyeR01EY021784 · NEI · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI A. Sue Menko, Mary Ann Stepp · 2011 to 2026
$7.3M
NEI NIH HHS EY021784NEI NIH HHS R01 EY021784
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The major impediment to understanding how an epithelial tissue executes wound repair is the limited availability of models in which it is possible to follow and manipulate the wound response ex vivo in an environment that closely mimics that of epithelial tissue injury in vivo. This issue was addressed by creating a clinically relevant epithelial ex vivo injury-repair model based on cataract surgery. In this culture model, the response of the lens epithelium to wounding can be followed live in the cells' native microenvironment, and the molecular mediators of wound repair easily manipulated during the repair process. To prepare the cultures, lenses are removed from the eye and a small incision is made in the anterior of the lens from which the inner mass of lens fiber cells is removed. This procedure creates a circular wound on the posterior lens capsule, the thick basement membrane that surrounds the lens. This wound area where the fiber cells were attached is located just adjacent to a continuous monolayer of lens epithelial cells that remains linked to the lens capsule during the surgical procedure. The wounded epithelium, the cell type from which fiber cells are derived during development, responds to the injury of fiber cell removal by moving collectively across the wound area, led by a population of vimentin-rich repair cells whose mesenchymal progenitors are endogenous to the lens. These properties are typical of a normal epithelial wound healing response. In this model, as in vivo, wound repair is dependent on signals supplied by the endogenous environment that is uniquely maintained in this ex vivo culture system, providing an ideal opportunity for discovery of the mechanisms that regulate repair of an epithelium following wounding.

Indexed as

Models, AnimalAnimalsCataractCataract ExtractionChick EmbryoEpithelial CellsLens, CrystallineWound Healing

Identifiers

PMID26132117
PMCPMC4545174
OpenAlexW560878409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.