Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26131981›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

The Health Equity and Effectiveness of Policy Options to Reduce Dietary Salt Intake in England: Policy Forecast.

Duncan O S Gillespie, Kirk Allen, Maria Guzman-Castillo, Piotr Bandosz, Patricia Moreira, Rory McGill, Elspeth Anwar, Ffion Lloyd-Williams, Helen Bromley, Peter J Diggle and 2 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Duncan O S GillespieDepartment of Public Health and Policy, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GB, United Kingdom.
Kirk AllenLancaster Medical School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YG, United Kingdom.
Maria Guzman-CastilloDepartment of Public Health and Policy, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GB, United Kingdom.
Piotr BandoszDepartment of Public Health and Policy, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GB, United Kingdom.
Patricia MoreiraDepartment of Public Health and Policy, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GB, United Kingdom.
Rory McGillDepartment of Public Health and Policy, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GB, United Kingdom.
Elspeth AnwarDepartment of Public Health and Policy, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GB, United Kingdom.
Ffion Lloyd-WilliamsDepartment of Public Health and Policy, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GB, United Kingdom.
Helen BromleyDepartment of Public Health and Policy, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GB, United Kingdom.
Peter J DiggleLancaster Medical School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YG, United Kingdom.
Simon CapewellDepartment of Public Health and Policy, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GB, United Kingdom.
Martin O'FlahertyDepartment of Public Health and Policy, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GB, United Kingdom.
University of Liverpool · GBLancaster University · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0900847
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPublic health action to reduce dietary salt intake has driven substantial reductions in coronary heart disease (CHD) over the past decade, but avoidable socio-economic differentials remain. We therefore forecast how further intervention to reduce dietary salt intake might affect the overall level and inequality of CHD mortality.

methodsWe considered English adults, with socio-economic circumstances (SEC) stratified by quintiles of the Index of Multiple Deprivation. We used IMPACTSEC, a validated CHD policy model, to link policy implementation to salt intake, systolic blood pressure and CHD mortality. We forecast the effects of mandatory and voluntary product reformulation, nutrition labelling and social marketing (e.g., health promotion, education). To inform our forecasts, we elicited experts' predictions on further policy implementation up to 2020. We then modelled the effects on CHD mortality up to 2025 and simultaneously assessed the socio-economic differentials of effect.

resultsMandatory reformulation might prevent or postpone 4,500 (2,900-6,100) CHD deaths in total, with the effect greater by 500 (300-700) deaths or 85% in the most deprived than in the most affluent. Further voluntary reformulation was predicted to be less effective and inequality-reducing, preventing or postponing 1,500 (200-5,000) CHD deaths in total, with the effect greater by 100 (-100-600) deaths or 49% in the most deprived than in the most affluent. Further social marketing and improvements to labelling might each prevent or postpone 400-500 CHD deaths, but minimally affect inequality.

conclusionsMandatory engagement with industry to limit salt in processed-foods appears a promising and inequality-reducing option. For other policy options, our expert-driven forecast warns that future policy implementation might reach more deprived individuals less well, limiting inequality reduction. We therefore encourage planners to prioritise equity.

Indexed as

Nutrition PolicySodium Chloride, DietaryCoronary Artery DiseaseEnglandHealth EquityHumansMortalitySocioeconomic FactorsSodium Chloride, Dietary

Identifiers

PMID26131981
PMCPMC4488881
OpenAlexW2159984702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.