Observational studyMedicine2015
A Clinical Parameters-Based Model Predicts Anastomotic Leakage After a Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision: A Large Study With Data From China.
Observational study in Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03013153 (Low or High Ligation of the Inferior Mesenteric Artery With Apical Lymph Node Dissection in Rectal Cancer Laparoscopic Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Low or High Ligation of the Inferior Mesenteric Artery With Apical Lymph Node Dissection in Rectal Cancer Laparoscopic Surgery: A Prospective, Multi-Center, Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel Group, Non-Inferiority Clinical Trial (LAND)
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review of preoperative and intraoperative colorectal Anastomotic Leak Prediction Scores (ALPS).BMJ open · 2023Pooled it
- A systematic review of the literature assessing operative blood loss and postoperative outcomes after colorectal surgery.International journal of colorectal disease · 2022Pooled it
- Preoperative risk factors associated with anastomotic leakage after colectomy for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes · 2022Pooled it
- Machine learning model-guided selective use of temporary diverting ileostomy in rectal cancer surgery: a randomized controlled trial.Nature communications · 2026Trial
- Machine learning-based preoperative analytics for the prediction of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery: a swiss pilot study.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Predictive Factors for Anastomotic Leakage Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Review
- Comparison of the efficacy of growth factor collagen and antibiotic collagen on colon anastomosis in experimental animals with peritonitis.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Colorectal anastomosis dehiscence: a call for more detailed morphological classification.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2021Article
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery is a major and life-threatening complication that occurs more frequently than expected. Intraoperative judgment in predicting potential leakage has shown extremely low sensitivity and specificity. The lack of a model for predicting anastomotic leakage might explain this insufficient judgment. We aimed to propose a clinical parameters-based model to predict anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME).This study was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively designed colorectal cancer dataset. In total, 1968 patients with a laparoscopic TME were enrolled from November 1, 2010, to March 20, 2014. The independent risk factors for anastomotic leakage were identified, from which the parameters-based model for leakage was developed.Anastomotic leakage was noted in 63 patients (3.2%). Male sex, a low level of anastomosis, intraoperative blood loss, diabetes, the duration time of the surgery, and low temperature were significantly associated by the bivariate analysis and the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test with an increased risk. From these factors, the logistic regression model identified the following 4 independent predictors: male sex (risk ratio [RR] = 1.85, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13-4.87), diabetes (RR = 2.08, 95% CI: 1.19-5.8), a lower anastomosis level (RR = 3.41, 95% CI: 1.17-6.71), and a high volume of blood loss (RR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.05). The locally weighted scatterplot smoothing regression showed an anastomosis within 5 cm from the anus and intraoperative blood loss of >100 mL as the cutoff values for a significantly increased risk of leakage. Based on these independent factors, a parameters-based model was established by the regression coefficients. The high and low-risk groups were classified according to scores of 3-5 and 0-2, with leakage rates of 8.57% and 1.66%, respectively (P < 0.001).This parameters-based model could predict the risk of anastomotic leakage following laparoscopic rectal cancer. After further validation, this model might facilitate the intraoperative recognition of high-risk patients to perform defunctional stomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.