ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015
Association between RAD51 polymorphisms and susceptibility of head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Association between RAD51 135 G/C polymorphism and risk of 3 common gynecological cancers: A meta-analysis.Medicine · 2018Pooled it
- A Review of the Repair of DNA Double Strand Breaks in the Development of Oral Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- DNA Damage Response Mechanisms in Head and Neck Cancer: Significant Implications for Therapy and Survival.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Targeting DNA damage response as a potential therapeutic strategy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Expression of RAD51 and Its Clinical Impact in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Analytical cellular pathology (Amsterdam) · 2020Article
- Genetic Polymorphisms in the RAD51 Gene with a Risk of Head and Neck Cancer and Esophageal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.International journal of genomics · 2019Review
- XPG Asp1104His, XRCC2 Rs3218536 A/G and RAD51 135G/C Gene Polymorphisms and Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Meta-AnalysisAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe associations between RAD51 gene polymorphisms (G135C and G172T) and risk of head and neck cancer (HNC) have been investigated, but the results are controversial. The aim of this study was to provide a more precise estimation of its relationship with HNC using a meta-analysis.
methodsRelevant studies were retrieved from the PubMed, Excerpta Medica Database, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. Strict selection and exclusion criteria were determined, and the odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to assess the strength of the association between RAD51 polymorphisms and HNC risk.
resultsSix studies were eligible for RAD51 G135C (1593 cases and 1719 controls), and three studies were eligible for RAD51 G172T (997 cases and 979 controls). In the overall population, significant association between RAD51 G135C polymorphism and HNC risk was observed under allele model (C vs G: OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.04-1.41, P = 0.015). In the subgroup analysis by smoking status, a significant association was found among smokers (C vs G: OR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.25-2.04; GC vs GG: OR = 2.29, 95% CI = 1.29-4.05; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 2.08, 95% CI = 1.56-2.78). When stratified based on drinking status, a significant association was found among drinkers(C vs G: OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.21-2.11; GC vs GG: OR = 2.50, 95% CI = 1.16-5.38; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 2.17,95% CI = 1.56-3.01). However, no significant association with HNC risk was demonstrated when stratified based on source of control and ethnicity. For G172T polymorphism, the results showed no significant risk association in overall analysis. In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, the result suggested that a decreased HNC risk was found among Caucasians (T vs G: OR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.72-0.95; TT vs GG: OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.46-0.84; TT vs GT + GG: OR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.49-0.84).
conclusionThis meta-analysis suggested that RAD51 G135C is associated with increased HNC risk, especially among smokers and drinkers, while G172T polymorphism may play a protective role against HNC among Caucasians. Larger-scale and well-designed studies are needed to further clarify the association.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26131267PMC4483860What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.