ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015
CT-guided microinvasive intervention in treating refractory carcinous pain.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the analgesic effect of CT-guided microinvasive intervention on refractory carcinous pain.
methodsA total of 23 patients with poor response to drug therapy for carcinous pain were selected: 6 patients underwent CT-guided neurolytic celiac plexus block (NCPB), 5 patients underwent CT-guided(125)I implantation and 12 patients underwent combined CT-guided NCPB and CT-guided(125)I implantation.
resultsAfter 1 week of treatment, 6 patients exhibited complete remission, 13 patients exhibited partial remission and 4 patients exhibited no changes in condition. The treatment efficiency rate was 82.6%. After 1 month of treatment, 5 patients exhibited complete remission, 14 patients exhibited partial remission and 4 patients exhibited no changes in condition. Treatment efficiency rate was 82.6%. After 3 months of treatment, 4 patients exhibited complete remission, 9 patients exhibited partial remission, 5 patients exhibited no changes in condition and 5 patients died. Treatment efficiency rate was 72.2%. After 6 months of treatment, 3 patients exhibited complete remission, 6 patients exhibited partial remission, 3 patients exhibited no changes in condition and 11 patients died. The treatment efficiency rate was 75.0%. No severe postoperative severe complications, such as bleeding, biliary fistula and pancreatic fistula, were reported.
conclusionCT-guided microinvasive intervention clearly demonstrated an analgesic effect on refractory carcinous pain with less trauma and few complications. Therefore, this method provides effective relief for carcinous pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26131176PMC4484021W2423002400What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.