ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015
Neutrophilic infiltration in lungs of mice with peritonitis in acid or basic medium.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sepsis-associated acute lung injury: do inflammatory lipid mediators flood the lungs by activating pulmonary TRP channels?Intensive care medicine experimental · 2026Review
- Altered Ecology of the Respiratory Tract Microbiome and Nosocomial Pneumonia.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Influence of indigenous microbiota on experimental toxoplasmosis in conventional and germ-free mice.International journal of experimental pathology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBacterial peritonitis is associated with systemic complications such as pneumonia.
objectiveTo determine in an experimental model of peritonitis whether the pH of peritoneal fluid infection influences the influx of neutrophils into the lung, and whether treatment outcome would be similar in peritonitis with liquid at any pH. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe studied 48 mice with peritonitis induced by cecal ligation and puncture. The animals were distributed randomly into three groups: the first one had an injection into the peritoneal cavity with saline, pH 7.0; the second group was injected with saline, pH 8.0; and the third group with saline, pH 3.0. After 2 hours, half the animals in each group was treated by washing the abdominal cavity with warm saline solution and administration of ceftriaxone every 12 hours, and half of each group was killed by anesthetic overdose, and lung biopsy was done. The animals kept in treatment were killed 24 hours after treatment, and lung biopsy was also performed. The samples were stained with H&E and the number of neutrophils in 20 areas was checked. The mean number of cells in each group was compared between groups and with an untreated one.
resultsThe group with peritonitis associated with alkaline solution showed a higher population of neutrophils during untreated peritonitis (P = 0.04). The response to treatment by lavage of the peritoneal cavity and antibiotics was more effective in reducing the population of neutrophils in the group with peritonitis at pH 8.0, unlike that observed in animals with peritonitis at pH 3.0 (P = 0.03).
conclusionPeritonitis associated with lower pH solution, despite the lower influx of leukocytes in the first two hours after installation of peritonitis, was not able to reduce the population of these cells in mice's lung in response to standard therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26131170PMC4483857W2395166633What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.