Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26131063›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015

Bone fracture and the interaction between bisphosphonates and proton pump inhibitors: a meta-analysis.

Si-Dong Yang, Qian Chen, Hai-Kun Wei, Feng Zhang, Da-Long Yang, Yong Shen, Wen-Yuan Ding

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guidelines on optimizing the use of proton pump inhibitors: PPI stewardship.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2023
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Drug-Induced Osteoporosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Si-Dong YangDepartment of Spinal Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University Shijiazhuang 050051, China.
Qian ChenDepartment of Spinal Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University Shijiazhuang 050051, China.
Hai-Kun WeiDepartment of Spinal Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University Shijiazhuang 050051, China.
Feng ZhangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University Shijiazhuang 050051, China.
Da-Long YangDepartment of Spinal Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University Shijiazhuang 050051, China.
Yong ShenDepartment of Spinal Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University Shijiazhuang 050051, China.
Wen-Yuan DingDepartment of Spinal Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University Shijiazhuang 050051, China ; Hebei Provincial Key Laboratory of Orthopedic Biomechanics Shijiazhuang 050051, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRecent studies suggested an increased risk of fractures with interaction between bisphosphonates (BPs) and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). We performed a meta-analysis of fractures between patients taking BPs/PPIs and those taking BPs only.

methodsWe conducted a PubMed database and Ovid database search, as well as Cochrane Library search (up to July 2014) for studies assessing the association between fractures and BPs or/and PPIs. We performed random effects meta-analysis of odds ratios (OR) according to fracture type and conducted subgroup analyses by race and BP subtypes. Heterogeneity was assessed using Q statistics and I(2) statistic.

resultsAfter study selection, 4 unique studies (5 comparisons) including 57259 patients were available for this meta-analysis. Pooled analysis of overall fracture risk of BP+PPI group versus BP group showed a significant increase in risk of fractures (OR = 1.52, P = 0.025), with substantial heterogeneity. However, heterogeneity was drastically reduced in subgroup of Asian (I(2) = 24% and P = 0.251), and fracture risk showed a significant increase (OR = 1.75, P = 0.026). In contrast, heterogeneity was little eliminated in subgroup of European, and fracture risk was no statistical difference (OR = 1.42, P = 0.068). Three studies including 4 comparisons reported on spine fracture were included in the pooled analysis demonstrating an increased spine fracture risk associated with BP/PPI interaction (OR = 1.60, 95% CI 1.13-2.26, P = 0.008, I(2) = 58.6%).

conclusionsThis meta-analysis suggests that there is an interaction associated with increased fracture risk (particularly for spine and Asian race) between BP and PPI use. Clinicians should carefully evaluate such risk factors for osteoporosis in patients taking BPs, before routinely prescribing PPIs, and make a careful judgment as to whether PPIs may be safe for patients at high risk of fractures.

Indexed as

bisphosphonateFracturemeta-analysisproton pump inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID26131063
PMCPMC4483859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.