ArticleInternational journal of mental health systems2015
The virtual institution: cross-sectional length of stay in general adult and forensic psychiatry beds.
Article in International journal of mental health systems, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Factors influencing the length of stay in forensic psychiatric settings: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2024Pooled it
- Study protocol: a randomised controlled trial of cognitive remediation for a national cohort of forensic mental health patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.BMC psychiatry · 2016Trial
- Short stays, high needs: gender disparities in Czech forensic psychiatric inpatient care.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Factors associated with length of stay in medium secure units: A realist review.Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists · 2024Review
- Italian Evaluation and Excellence in REMS (ITAL-EE-REMS): appropriate placement of forensic patients in REMS forensic facilities.International journal of mental health systems · 2024Article
- Examining the need for a high level of therapeutic security at a regional forensic mental health service in Aotearoa New Zealand.Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2024Article
- Excellence in forensic psychiatry services: international survey of qualities and correlates.BJPsych open · 2023Article
- Socio-demographic, clinical and offense-related characteristics of forensic psychiatric inpatients in Hunan, China: a cross-sectional survey.BMC psychiatry · 2023Article
- Article
- Advancing research in adult secure mental health services in England.Medicine, science, and the law · 2022Article
- A tool to evaluate proportionality and necessity in the use of restrictive practices in forensic mental health settings: the DRILL tool (Dundrum restriction, intrusion and liberty ladders).BMC psychiatry · 2020Observational
- A Comparison of English and Dutch Long-Stay Patients in Forensic Psychiatric Care.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2020Article
- The experience of long stay in high and medium secure psychiatric hospitals in England: qualitative study of the patient perspective.International journal of mental health systems · 2020Article
- Retrospective Analysis of Factors Associated with Long-Stay Hospitalizations in an Acute Psychiatric Ward.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2020Article
- Time of Day Matters: An Exploratory Assessment of Chronotype in a Forensic Psychiatric Hospital.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2020Article
- A retrospective study comparing the length of admission of medium secure unit patients admitted in the three decades since 1985.BJPsych bulletin · 2019Article
- Perspective On Excellence in Forensic Mental Health Services: What We Can Learn From Oncology and Other Medical Services.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2019Article
- Prospective observational cohort study of 'treatment as usual' over four years for patients with schizophrenia in a national forensic hospital.BMC psychiatry · 2018Observational
- Predictors of quality of life among inpatients in forensic mental health: implications for occupational therapists.BMC psychiatry · 2018Observational
- Analysis of length of hospital stay using electronic health records: A statistical and data mining approach.PloS one · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLength of stay in psychiatric hospitals interests health service planners, economists and clinicians. At a systems level it is preferable to study general adult and forensic psychiatric beds together since these are likely to be inter-dependent. We examined whether patients were placed according to specialist need or according to their cross-sectional length of stay.
methodsA one night census of all registered mental nursing home (RMNH) beds was carried out for a defined catchment area of 1.2 m population in north London in November 1999. This included all public sector psychiatric hospital beds, independent sector and forensic beds in and outside the catchment area. Cross-sectional length of stay was defined as time since the date of admission from the community. Log rank (Mantel-Cox) Chi squared was used to test for differences between groups and hierarchical logistic regression for statistical modelling.
resultsThere were 1,085 occupied psychiatric beds. Cross-sectional LOS was greater than 365 days in 43.5%. Forensic beds had longer cross-sectional LOS than general beds. LOS increased with the level of therapeutic security from open through low, medium and high secure. Cross-sectional LOS was shorter for open hospital beds than community RMNH beds, shorter for informal patients than those detained under civil mental health law, and longest for forensic detentions. Longest cross-sectional LOS were for patients placed in RMNHs in the community, 10.7% of whom were 'forensic' as were 25.4% of low secure patients. Designated length of stay (acute, rehab/medium term and long term) was also associated with increasing cross-sectional LOS. In regression analysis only three variables contributed to a model of cross-sectional LOS, commissioning status (general or forensic), designated length of stay and designated level of therapeutic security.
conclusionsStudying cross-sectional LOS for whole systems (all psychiatric beds) is essential for operational health service management. At the time of this survey 'forensic' status was the main way of accessing long term high dependency places. This has been an organic development over time, a response to patient needs rather than the outcome of any specific policy or plan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.