ArticleAnnals of neurosciences2015
The outcome after aneurysmal sub arachnoid hemorrhage: a study of various factors.
Article in Annals of neurosciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- A novel nomogram model for clinical outcomes of severe subarachnoid hemorrhage patients.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Korean Clinical Practice Guidelines for Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2018Review
- Comparative evaluation of H&H and WFNS grading scales with modified H&H (sans systemic disease): A study on 1000 patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage.Neurosurgical review · 2018Article
- Polyuria and cerebral vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.BMC neurology · 2015Article
- Serum lipid profile spectrum and delayed cerebral ischemia following subarachnoid hemorrhage: Is there a relation?Surgical neurology international · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (A-SAH), despite improvement in surgical and medical treatments, is still a serious disease with high fatality and morbidity rates. Despite the huge advances in neurosurgical management of the disease, there has not been a proportional improvement in outcome of this condition. PURPOSE: We studied various factors which can influence the final outcome and these included: World federation of neurosurgical societies (WFNS), Hunt & Hess (H&H) and Fisher grade, size of aneurysm, intra operative rupture (IOR), temporary clipping (TC) - and correlate their individual impact in final outcome.
methodsWe studied 100 patients of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage prospectively all of whom were operated upon .Post operative course was followed and final outcome studied.
resultsPre operatively, higher WFNS and H&H grades had a worse outcome. This correlation was not found for Fisher grade. Nonetheless, presence of IVH(Fisher grade 4) acted as an independent risk factor for poor outcome.
conclusionDiabetes and smoking led to a worse outcome in contrast to hypertension . IOR led to poor outcome while temporary clipping did not.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.