Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26130606›Full record

ArticleVision research2015

A perceptual space of local image statistics.

Jonathan D Victor, Daniel J Thengone, Syed M Rizvi, Mary M Conte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vision research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Geometry of Low- and High-Level Perceptual Spaces.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Discrimination of textures with spatial correlations and multiple gray levels.Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Evaluation of non-Gaussian statistical properties in virtual breast phantoms.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Textures as Probes of Visual Processing.Annual review of vision science · 2017
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jonathan D VictorBrain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, United States. Electronic address: jdvicto@med.cornell.edu.
Daniel J ThengoneBrain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, United States.
Syed M RizviBrain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, United States.
Mary M ConteBrain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, United States.

Funding

CENTRAL PROCESSING OF VISUAL INFORMATIONR01EY007977 · NEI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI Jonathan D Victor · 1989 to 2026
$9.0M
NEI NIH HHS EY7977NEI NIH HHS R01 EY007977
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Local image statistics are important for visual analysis of textures, surfaces, and form. There are many kinds of local statistics, including those that capture luminance distributions, spatial contrast, oriented segments, and corners. While sensitivity to each of these kinds of statistics have been well-studied, much less is known about visual processing when multiple kinds of statistics are relevant, in large part because the dimensionality of the problem is high and different kinds of statistics interact. To approach this problem, we focused on binary images on a square lattice - a reduced set of stimuli which nevertheless taps many kinds of local statistics. In this 10-parameter space, we determined psychophysical thresholds to each kind of statistic (16 observers) and all of their pairwise combinations (4 observers). Sensitivities and isodiscrimination contours were consistent across observers. Isodiscrimination contours were elliptical, implying a quadratic interaction rule, which in turn determined ellipsoidal isodiscrimination surfaces in the full 10-dimensional space, and made predictions for sensitivities to complex combinations of statistics. These predictions, including the prediction of a combination of statistics that was metameric to random, were verified experimentally. Finally, check size had only a mild effect on sensitivities over the range from 2.8 to 14min, but sensitivities to second- and higher-order statistics was substantially lower at 1.4min. In sum, local image statistics form a perceptual space that is highly stereotyped across observers, in which different kinds of statistics interact according to simple rules.

Indexed as

Statistics as TopicAdultBiometryContrast SensitivityFemaleForm PerceptionHumansMaleMiddle AgedPattern Recognition, VisualYoung AdultIntermediate visionLocal featuresMetamersMultipoint correlationsVisual textures

Identifiers

PMID26130606
PMCPMC4651867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.