Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26130233›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2015

Combined Modality Management of Retroperitoneal Sarcomas: A Single-Institution Series of 121 Patients.

Andrew J Bishop, Gunar K Zagars, Keila E Torres, Kelly K Hunt, Janice N Cormier, Barry W Feig, B Ashleigh Guadagnolo

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Surgery for Abdominal Well-Differentiated Liposarcoma.Current treatment options in oncology · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Retroperitoneal soft-tissue sarcomas: Radiotherapy experience from a tertiary cancer center and review of current evidence.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology
    Article
  13. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew J BishopDepartment of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Gunar K ZagarsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Keila E TorresDepartment of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Kelly K HuntDepartment of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Janice N CormierDepartment of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Barry W FeigDepartment of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
B Ashleigh GuadagnoloDepartment of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Health Services Research, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. Electronic address: aguadagn@mdanderson.org.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Axl receptor signaling in MPNST; potential node for therapyK08CA160443 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI TORRES, KEILA ENITT · 2012 to 2016
$853k
NCI NIH HHS CA016672NCI NIH HHS K08 CA160443NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to investigate local control, survival outcomes, and complication rates of patients treated with aggressive surgery and radiation therapy (RT) for retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS). METHODS AND MATERIALS: We reviewed the medical records of 121 consecutive patients treated for RPS with surgery and RT between 1965 and 2012. The most common histology was liposarcoma (n = 42; 35%). The median follow-up was 100 months (range: 20-467 months). Eighty-six patients (71%) were treated for initial presentation of RPS, and 35 patients (29%) presented with and were treated for RPS recurrence. RT was preoperative in 88 patients (73%; median dose: 50.4 Gy) and postoperative in 33 patients (27%; median dose: 55 Gy).

resultsFive-year local control and overall survival rates were 56% and 57%, respectively. Two factors were associated with higher risk of any intra-abdominal recurrence at 5 years: positive or uncertain margins (58% vs 30% for negative margins, P < .001; hazard ratio [HR]: 2.7; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.6-4.8) and disease recurrence after previous resection (76% vs 31% for de novo RPS, P < .001; HR: 4.4; 95% CI: 2.5-7.5). The 10-year complication rate was 5%, and RT-related complications were associated with postoperative RT (P < .001) and RT dose of ≥ 60 Gy (P < .001).

conclusionsIntra-abdominal RPS recurrence continues to be a significant challenge despite the use of aggressive surgery and radiation therapy. Given the complications associated with postoperative radiation therapy, we recommend that preoperative radiation therapy is the preferred strategy when combined modality therapy is recommended.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansLiposarcomaMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRadiotherapy DosageRetroperitoneal NeoplasmsSarcomaSurvival RateYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26130233
PMCPMC4928583
OpenAlexW2021360211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.