Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26130106›Full record

ArticleMedical hypotheses2015

Diagnostic assessment of osteosarcoma chemoresistance based on Virtual Clinical Trials.

K A Rejniak, M C Lloyd, D R Reed, M M Bui

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical hypotheses, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Bioscience reports · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Microenvironmental Niches and Sanctuaries: A Route to Acquired Resistance.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2016
    Article
  16. Prospective PreliminaryBioResearch open access · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

K A RejniakIntegrated Mathematical Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States; Center of Excellence in Cancer Imaging and Technology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States; Oncologic Sciences Department, School of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States. Electronic address: Kasia.Rejniak@moffitt.org.
M C LloydAnalytic Microscopy Core, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States; Department of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois in Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
D R ReedSarcoma Department, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States; Adolescent and Young Adult Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States; Chemical Biology and Molecular Medicine Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States; Oncologic Sciences Department, School of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States.
M M BuiSarcoma Department, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States; Chemical Biology and Molecular Medicine Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States; Department of Anatomic Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States; Analytic Microscopy Core, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States; Oncologic Sciences Department, School of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States.
Moffitt Cancer Center · USUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHP30CA076292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI Christine O'Connell · 1998 to 2026
$93.5M
Integrative Molecular Epidemiology WorkshopR25CA174664 · NCI · AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH · PI Shelley S Tworoger · 2013 to 2026
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA076292NCI NIH HHS P30-CA076292NCI NIH HHS R25 CA174664
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteosarcoma is the most common primary bone tumor in pediatric and young adult patients. Successful treatment of osteosarcomas requires a combination of surgical resection and systemic chemotherapy, both neoadjuvant (prior to surgery) and adjuvant (after surgery). The degree of necrosis following neoadjuvant chemotherapy correlates with the subsequent probability of disease-free survival. Tumors with less than 10% of viable cells after treatment represent patients with a more favorable prognosis. However, being able to predict early, such as at the time of the pre-treatment tumor biopsy, how the patient will respond to the standard chemotherapy would provide an opportunity for more personalized patient care. Patients with unfavorable predictions could be studied in a protocol, rather than a standard setting, towards improving therapeutic success. The onset of necrotic cells in osteosarcomas treated with chemotherapeutic agents is a measure of tumor sensitivity to the drugs. We hypothesize that the remaining viable cells, i.e., cells that have not responded to the treatment, are chemoresistant, and that the pathological characteristics of these chemoresistant tumor cells within the osteosarcoma pre-treatment biopsy can predict tumor response to the standard-of-care chemotherapeutic treatment. This hypothesis can be tested by comparing patient histopathology samples before, as well as after treatment to identify both morphological and immunochemical cellular features that are characteristic of chemoresistant cells, i.e., cells that survived treatment. Consequently, using computational simulations of dynamic changes in tumor pathology under the simulated standard of care chemotherapeutic treatment, one can couple the pre- and post-treatment morphological and spatial patterns of chemoresistant cells, and correlate them with patient clinical diagnoses. This procedure, that we named 'Virtual Clinical Trials', can serve as a potential predictive biomarker providing a novel value-added decision support tool for oncologists.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicDrug Resistance, NeoplasmAntineoplastic AgentsBone NeoplasmsHumansOsteosarcomaAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID26130106
PMCPMC4549200
OpenAlexW1845737087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.