ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine
Serial Evaluation of Abdominal Fluid and Serum Amino-terminal pro-C-type Natriuretic Peptide in Dogs with Septic Peritonitis.
Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Utility of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin in identifying septic cavitary effusions in dogs.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2026Article
- Diagnosis and surgical management of septic peritonitis in small animals: A review.Veterinary surgery : VS · 2026Review
- Diagnosis of Septic Body Cavity Effusion in Dogs and Cats: Cytology vs. Bacterial Culture.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Biomarkers from Peritoneal Fluid as Predictors of Severity for Abdominal Sepsis Patients Following Emergency Laparotomy.Journal of inflammation research · 2023Article
- Biomarker Guided Diagnosis of Septic Peritonitis in Dogs.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2019Article
- Plasma procalcitonin concentrations predict organ dysfunction and outcome in dogs with sepsis.BMC veterinary research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSerum N-terminal pro-C-natriuretic peptide (NT-proCNP) has shown promise as a diagnostic biomarker for sepsis. Its sensitivity to detect dogs with septic peritonitis (SP) is reportedly low, perhaps attributable to the compartmentalization of NT-proCNP in the abdominal cavity.
objectivesTo evaluate the use of an ELISA for the measurement of NT-proCNP in canine abdominal fluid and to describe the peri-operative pattern of abdominal fluid and serum NT-proCNP concentrations in dogs with SP. ANIMALS: Five client-owned dogs with nonseptic abdominal effusion of varying etiologies and 12 client-owned dogs with SP undergoing abdominal surgery and placement of a closed-suction abdominal drain (CSAD). Six dogs were included upon hospital admission; 6 were included the day after surgery.
methodsProspective pilot study. A commercially available ELISA kit was analytically validated for use on canine abdominal fluid. The NT-proCNP concentrations were measured in the abdominal fluid of control dogs, and in serum and abdominal fluid of dogs with SP from admission for CSAD removal.
resultsIn dogs with SP, admission abdominal fluid NT-proCNP concentrations were lower than the concurrent serum concentrations (P = 0.031), and lower than control canine abdominal fluid concentrations (P = 0.015). Postoperatively, abdominal fluid NT-proCNP concentrations remained lower than serum concentrations (P < 0.050), except on day 4. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: The ELISA kit was able to measure NT-proCNP in canine abdominal fluid. In dogs with SP, low serum NT-proCNP concentrations cannot be explained by abdominal compartmentalization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.