Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26129947›Full record

Trial reportEuropean heart journal2015

Stroke in the TOTAL trial: a randomized trial of routine thrombectomy vs. percutaneous coronary intervention alone in ST elevation myocardial infarction.

Sanjit S Jolly, John A Cairns, Salim Yusuf, Brandi Meeks, Peggy Gao, Robert G Hart, Sasko Kedev, Goran Stankovic, Raul Moreno, David Horak and 13 more

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European heart journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. No-reflow after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: an angiographic core laboratory analysis of the TOTAL Trial.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Temporal trends and outcomes of acute ischaemic strokes in patients hospitalised for percutaneous coronary intervention.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Double protection in patients with a massive thrombus in the infarct-related artery - a single-center retrospective study.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. A prospective, first-in-human use of the NeVa mechanical thrombectomy device for patients with acute coronary syndromes.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Thrombus Aspiration: Is It the Art or the Science?Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Sanjit S JollyThe Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Rm. C3-118, DBCVSRI Building, Hamilton General Hospital, 237 Barton St. East, Hamilton, ON, L8L 2X2, Canada sanjit.jollly@phri.ca.
John A CairnsDepartment of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Salim YusufThe Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Rm. C3-118, DBCVSRI Building, Hamilton General Hospital, 237 Barton St. East, Hamilton, ON, L8L 2X2, Canada.
Brandi MeeksThe Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Rm. C3-118, DBCVSRI Building, Hamilton General Hospital, 237 Barton St. East, Hamilton, ON, L8L 2X2, Canada.
Peggy GaoThe Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Rm. C3-118, DBCVSRI Building, Hamilton General Hospital, 237 Barton St. East, Hamilton, ON, L8L 2X2, Canada.
Robert G HartThe Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Rm. C3-118, DBCVSRI Building, Hamilton General Hospital, 237 Barton St. East, Hamilton, ON, L8L 2X2, Canada.
Sasko KedevUniversity Clinic of Cardiology, Sts. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, Macedonia.
Goran StankovicClinical Center of Serbia, Department of Cardiology, Medical Faculty, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Raul MorenoUniversity Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
David HorakKrajská Nemocnice Liberec, Liberec, Czech Republic.
Saleem KassamRouge Valley Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Michael J RokossThe Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Rm. C3-118, DBCVSRI Building, Hamilton General Hospital, 237 Barton St. East, Hamilton, ON, L8L 2X2, Canada.
Raymond C M LeungCK Hui Heart Centre, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Magdi El-OmarCentral Manchester Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
Hannu O RomppanenHeart Centre, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Ashraf AlazzoniThe Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Rm. C3-118, DBCVSRI Building, Hamilton General Hospital, 237 Barton St. East, Hamilton, ON, L8L 2X2, Canada.
Aiman AlakThe Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Rm. C3-118, DBCVSRI Building, Hamilton General Hospital, 237 Barton St. East, Hamilton, ON, L8L 2X2, Canada.
Anthony FungDivision of Cardiology, Vancouver General Hospital/University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Dimitrios AlexopoulosPatras University Hospital, Patras, Greece.
John D SchwalmThe Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Rm. C3-118, DBCVSRI Building, Hamilton General Hospital, 237 Barton St. East, Hamilton, ON, L8L 2X2, Canada.
Nicholas ValettasThe Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Rm. C3-118, DBCVSRI Building, Hamilton General Hospital, 237 Barton St. East, Hamilton, ON, L8L 2X2, Canada.
Vladimír DžavíkPeter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
TOTAL Investigators

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTOTAL (N = 10 732), a randomized trial of routine manual thrombectomy vs. percutaneous coronary intervention alone in ST elevation myocardial infarction, showed no difference in the primary efficacy outcome but a significant increase in stroke. We sought to understand these findings. METHODS AND

resultsA detailed analysis of stroke timing, stroke severity, and stroke subtype was performed. Strokes were adjudicated by neurologists blinded to treatment assignment. Stroke within 30 days, the primary safety outcome, was increased [33 (0.7%) vs. 16 (0.3%), hazard ratio (HR) 2.06; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13-3.75]. The difference in stroke was apparent within 48 h [15 (0.3%) vs. 5 (0.1%), HR 3.00; 95% CI 1.09-8.25]. There was an increase in strokes within 180 days with minor or no disability (Rankin 0-2) [18 (0.4%) vs. 13 (0.3%) HR 1.38; 95% CI 0.68-2.82] and in strokes with major disability or fatal (Rankin 3-6) [35 (0.7%) vs. 13 (0.3%), HR 2.69; 95% CI 1.42-5.08]. Most of the absolute difference was due to an increase in ischaemic strokes within 180 days [37 (0.7%) vs. 21 (0.4%), HR 1.71; 95% CI 1.03-3.00], but there was also an increase in haemorrhagic strokes [10 (0.2%) vs. 2 (0.04%), HR 4.98; 95% CI 1.09-22.7]. Patients that had a stroke had a mortality of 30.8% within 180 days vs. 3.4% without a stroke (P < 0.001). A meta-analysis of randomized trials (N = 21 173) showed an increase in risk of stroke (odds ratio 1.59; 95% CI 1.11-2.27) but a trend towards reduction in mortality odds ratio (odds ratio 0.87; 95% CI 0.76-1.00).

conclusionThrombectomy was associated with a significant increase in stroke. Based on these findings, future trials must carefully collect stroke to determine safety in addition to efficacy.

Indexed as

AgedFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMyocardial InfarctionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPostoperative ComplicationsStrokeThrombectomyTreatment OutcomeMeta-analysisRandomized trialSTEMIStrokeThrombectomy

Identifiers

PMID26129947
PMCPMC4568405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.