Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26129679›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2016

Choosing Under the Influence: A Drug-Specific Mechanism by Which the Setting Controls Drug Choices in Rats.

Youna Vandaele, Lauriane Cantin, Fuschia Serre, Caroline Vouillac-Mendoza, Serge H Ahmed

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Demand for heroin in rats: effects of non-drug alternative substitutes and complements.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. More than just a prime: Cocaine gives monkeys the munchies.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The complexity of drug choice: rats prefer alcohol over social interaction.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Article
  9. Rats choose alcohol over social reward in an operant choice procedure.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Pharmacokinetics trumps pharmacodynamics during cocaine choice: a reconciliation with the dopamine hypothesis of addiction.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Youna VandaeleUniversité de Bordeaux, Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives, UMR CNRS 5293, Bordeaux, France.
Lauriane CantinInstitut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.
Fuschia SerreSANPSY, CNRS USR 3413, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Caroline Vouillac-MendozaUniversité de Bordeaux, Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives, UMR CNRS 5293, Bordeaux, France.
Serge H AhmedUniversité de Bordeaux, Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives, UMR CNRS 5293, Bordeaux, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut Bergonié · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ample evidence shows that the setting can control drug choices in both humans and animals. Here we reveal in rats that a major mechanism of this control involves a regulation of the drug influence on other competing options at the time of choice. Briefly, rats were offered a choice between a drug dose (cocaine or heroin) and a brief access to water sweetened with saccharin in two different settings. In one setting, choosing under the influence was not possible and rats largely preferred saccharin over either cocaine or heroin. In contrast, when the same rats were shifted to a setting where choosing under the influence was possible, they chose the drug either nonexclusively or exclusively depending on whether the drug enhanced or suppressed sweet reward, respectively. Thus, when rats were under the orexigenic influence of heroin at the time of choice, they more frequently chose saccharin in alternation with heroin. In contrast, when rats were under the anorexic influence of cocaine, they stopped choosing saccharin and continued taking cocaine exclusively. These setting- and drug-specific changes in preference were rapid and reversible, and could be induced by passively administering cocaine or heroin before choice. Finally, rats behaved as if they were oblivious to the drug influence on their choices. This behavior could explain why rats are vulnerable to harm themselves, sometimes to the point of death, in settings where choices are made under the drug influence, notably if this influence excludes other important options or, conversely, enhances harmful ones.

Indexed as

AnimalsChoice BehaviorCocaineConditioning, OperantDopamine Uptake InhibitorsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrinking BehaviorDrinking WaterFollow-Up StudiesFood DeprivationHeroinMaleNarcoticsRats, WistarRewardSaccharinCocaineDopamine Uptake InhibitorsDrinking WaterHeroinNarcoticsSaccharin

Identifiers

PMID26129679
PMCPMC5130140
OpenAlexW1571530925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.