Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26129678›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2016

Comparing Pharmacological Modulation of Sensory Gating in Healthy Humans and Rats: The Effects of Reboxetine and Haloperidol.

Louise Witten, Jesper Frank Bastlund, Birte Y Glenthøj, Christoffer Bundgaard, Björn Steiniger-Brach, Arne Mørk, Bob Oranje

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The Auditory P50 Gating in Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Case-Control Study.American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Louise WittenSynaptic Transmission 1, H. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark.
Jesper Frank BastlundSynaptic Transmission 1, H. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark.
Birte Y GlenthøjCenter for Clinical Intervention and Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research (CINS). Center for Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research (CNSR), Copenhagen University Hospital, Psychiatric Center Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark.
Christoffer BundgaardDiscovery DMPK, H. Lundbeck A/S, Copenhagen-Valby, Denmark.
Björn Steiniger-BrachMedical Affairs-Addiction Disorders, H. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark.
Arne MørkSynaptic Transmission 1, H. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark.
Bob OranjeCenter for Clinical Intervention and Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research (CINS). Center for Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research (CNSR), Copenhagen University Hospital, Psychiatric Center Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark.
Lundbeck (Denmark) · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DKGlostrup Hospital · DKUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory gating is the brain's ability to filter out irrelevant information before it reaches high levels of conscious processing. In the current study we aimed to investigate the involvement of the noradrenergic and dopaminergic neurotransmitter systems in sensory gating. Furthermore, we investigated cross-species reliability by comparing effects in both healthy humans and rats, while keeping all experimental conditions as similar as possible between the species. The design of the human experiment (n=21) was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study where sensory gating was assessed following a dose of either reboxetine (8 mg), haloperidol (2 mg), their combination or placebo at four separate visits. Similarly in the animal experiment sensory gating was assessed in rats, (n=22) following a dose of reboxetine (2 mg/kg), haloperidol (0.08 mg/kg), their combination or placebo. The sensory gating paradigms in both experiments were identical. In humans, we found significantly reduced P50 suppression following separate administration of reboxetine or haloperidol, while their combined administration did not reach statistical significance compared with placebo. In the rats, we found a similar significant reduction of sensory gating (N40) following treatment with haloperidol and the combination of haloperidol and reboxetine, but not with separate reboxetine treatment, compared with placebo. Our study indicates that even when experimental conditions are kept as similar as possible, direct human to rat cross-species translation of pharmacological effects on sensory gating is challenging, which calls for more focussed research in this important translational area.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdolescentAdrenergic Uptake InhibitorsAdultAnimalsAuditory PerceptionCA3 Region, HippocampalCross-Over StudiesDopamine AntagonistsDouble-Blind MethodEvoked Potentials, AuditoryHaloperidolHumansMaleMorpholinesRatsAdrenergic Uptake InhibitorsDopamine AntagonistsHaloperidolMorpholinesReboxetine

Identifiers

PMID26129678
PMCPMC5130139
OpenAlexW1521433906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.