Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26129632›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2015

Approaches to supporting lactation and breastfeeding for very preterm infants in the NICU: a qualitative study in three European regions.

Mercedes Bonet, Emanuela Forcella, Béatrice Blondel, Elizabeth S Draper, Rocco Agostino, Marina Cuttini, Jennifer Zeitlin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Mercedes BonetInserm UMR 1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team, (Epopé). Center for Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France DHU Risks in Pregnancy, Paris, France Paris-Descartes University, Paris, France.
Emanuela ForcellaDepartment of International Cooperation, Laziosanità-Agenzia di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy.
Béatrice BlondelInserm UMR 1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team, (Epopé). Center for Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France DHU Risks in Pregnancy, Paris, France Paris-Descartes University, Paris, France.
Elizabeth S DraperDepartment of Health Science, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Rocco AgostinoDepartment for Mother's and Infant's Health, Hospital S. Giovanni Calibita-Fatebenefratelli, Rome, Italy.
Marina CuttiniResearch Unit of Perinatal Epidemiology, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Jennifer ZeitlinInserm UMR 1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team, (Epopé). Center for Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France DHU Risks in Pregnancy, Paris, France Paris-Descartes University, Paris, France.
Sorbonne Paris Cité · FRASL Roma · ITFatebenefratelli Hospital · ITInserm · FRIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITUniversity of Leicester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore differences in approaches to supporting lactation and breastfeeding for very preterm infants in neonatal intensive care units (NICU) in 3 European regions.

designQualitative cross-sectional study carried out by means of face-to-face semistructured interviews. Verbatim transcripts were coded using a theoretical framework derived from the literature and supplemented by data-driven concepts and codes.

setting4 purposively selected NICUs in each of 3 European regions in 2010 (Ile-de-France in France, Lazio in Italy, and the former Trent region in the UK).

participantsNICU staff members (n=22).

resultsPolicies and practices for managing mother's own milk for very preterm babies differed between regions, and were much more complex in Ile-de-France than in the Trent or Lazio regions. Staff approaches to mothers to initiate lactation differed by region, with an emphasis on the nutritional and immunological value of human milk in the Trent region and on the 'normalising' effect of breastfeeding on the mother-child relationship in Lazio. French and English staff expressed conflicting opinions about the use of bottles, which was routine in Italy. Italian informants stressed the importance of early maternal milk expression and feeding, but also mentioned discharging infants home before feeding at the breast was established. In Ile-de-France and Trent, successful feeding from the breast was achieved before discharge, although this was seen as a factor that could prolong hospitalisation and discourage continued breastfeeding for some women.

conclusionsTargeted health promotion policies in the NICU are necessary to increase the number of infants receiving their mother's milk and to support mothers with transfer of the infant to the breast. Integrating knowledge about the different approaches to lactation and breastfeeding in European NICUs could improve the relevance of recommendations in multiple cultural settings.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFranceHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureIntensive Care, NeonatalInterviews as TopicItalyLactationMilk, HumanNursesPhysiciansQualitative ResearchUnited KingdomBreastfeedingEuropeVery preterm infants

Identifiers

PMID26129632
PMCPMC4486942
OpenAlexW2222917613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.