Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26126626›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2015

Coffee Consumption and Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma by Sex: The Liver Cancer Pooling Project.

Jessica L Petrick, Neal D Freedman, Barry I Graubard, Vikrant V Sahasrabuddhe, Gabriel Y Lai, Michael C Alavanja, Laura E Beane-Freeman, Deborah A Boggs, Julie E Buring, Andrew T Chan and 21 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Coffee Consumption and Cancer Risk: An Assessment of the Health Implications Based on Recent Knowledge.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica L PetrickDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland. jessica.petrick@nih.gov.
Neal D FreedmanDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Barry I GraubardDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Vikrant V SahasrabuddheDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Gabriel Y LaiDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Michael C AlavanjaDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Laura E Beane-FreemanDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Deborah A BoggsSlone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Julie E BuringDepartment of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Andrew T ChanDepartment of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Dawn Q ChongDivision of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Charles S FuchsDepartment of Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Susan M GapsturEpidemiology Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia.
John Michael GazianoDepartment of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Edward L GiovannucciDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Albert R HollenbeckAARP, Washington, DC.
Lindsay Y KingDepartment of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jill KoshiolDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
I-Min LeeDepartment of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Martha S LinetDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Julie R PalmerSlone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jenny N PoynterDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Mark P PurdueOntario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kim RobienExercise and Nutrition Sciences, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC.
Catherine SchairerDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Howard D SessoDepartment of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Alice J SigurdsonDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Anne Zeleniuch-JacquotteDepartment of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York.
Jean Wactawski-WendeDepartment of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York.
Peter T CampbellEpidemiology Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia.
Katherine A McGlynnDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Harvard University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USNational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Statistical MethodsP01CA087969 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI ROSNER, BERNARD A · 2000 to 2019
$77.8M
Women's Health Study: Continued Follow-upR01CA047988 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI BURING, JULIE E., LEE, I-MIN · 1991 to 2014
$28.2M
Long Term Multidisciplinary Study of Cancer in Women: The Nurses Health StudyUM1CA186107 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI ELIASSEN, A. HEATHER, STAMPFER, MEIR · 2014 to 2023
$22.3M
Studies of Rare CancersZIACP010158 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI MCGLYNN, KATHERINE · 2009 to 2025
$19.1M
Cancer Epidemiology Cohort in Male Health ProfessionalsU01CA167552 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI Lorelei Mucci, Walter C. Willett · 2017 to 2026
$17.0M
A Follow-up Study for Causes of Cancer in Black WomenUM1CA164974 · NCI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI ROSENBERG, LYNN · 2012 to 2017
$13.7M
Cancer Epidemiology Cohort in Male Health ProfessionalsUM1CA167552 · NCI · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI WILLETT, WALTER C. · 2012 to 2016
$11.5M
EPIDEMIOLOGY OF CANCER IN A COHORT OF OLDER WOMENR01CA039742 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI LAZOVICH, DEANN · 1985 to 2014
$8.0M
Women's Health Study: Continued Follow-UpR01HL080467 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI BURING, JULIE E. · 2005 to 2010
$4.5M
The Women's Health Study: Infrastructure Support for Continued Cohort Follow-upUM1CA182913 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI BURING, JULIE E., LEE, I-MIN · 2014 to 2018
$4.0M
The NYU Women's Health StudyUM1CA182934 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI ZELENIUCH-JAQUOTTE, ANNE · 2015 to 2019
$3.7M
Studies of Rare CancersZ01CP010158 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI BRINTON, LOUISE · 2001 to 2008
$2.4M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 CP010158NCI NIH HHS CA047988NCI NIH HHS CA167552NCI NIH HHS CA186107NCI NIH HHS CA39742NCI NIH HHS CA87969NCI NIH HHS P01 CA087969NCI NIH HHS R01 CA039742NCI NIH HHS R01 CA047988NCI NIH HHS U01 CA167552NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA164974NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA167552NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA182913NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA182934NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA186107NHLBI NIH HHS HL080467NHLBI NIH HHS HL099355NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL043851NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL080467NHLBI NIH HHS RC1 HL099355NIDDK NIH HHS DK098311NIDDK NIH HHS K24 DK098311
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoffee consumption has been reported to be inversely associated with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most common type of liver cancer. Caffeine has chemopreventive properties, but whether caffeine is responsible for the coffee-HCC association is not well studied. In addition, few studies have examined the relationship by sex, and no studies have examined whether there is an association between coffee and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), the second most common type of liver cancer.

methodsIn the Liver Cancer Pooling Project, a consortium of U.S.-based cohort studies, data from 1,212,893 individuals (HCC, n = 860; ICC, n = 260) in nine cohorts were pooled. Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using proportional hazards regression.

resultsHigher coffee consumption was associated with lower risk of HCC (HR>3 cups/day vs. non-drinker, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.53-0.99; Ptrend cups/day = <0.0001). More notable reduced risk was seen among women than men (Pinteraction = 0.07). Women who consumed more than three cups of coffee per day were at a 54% lower risk of HCC (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.26-0.81), whereas men had more modest reduced risk of HCC (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.63-1.37). The associations were stronger for caffeinated coffee (HR>3 cups/day vs. non-drinker, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.50-1.01) than decaffeinated coffee (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.55-1.54). There was no association between coffee consumption and ICC.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that, in a U.S. population, coffee consumption is associated with reduced risk of HCC. IMPACT: Further research into specific coffee compounds and mechanisms that may account for these associations is needed.

Indexed as

Bile Ducts, IntrahepaticCoffeeAgedBile Duct NeoplasmsCaffeineCarcinoma, HepatocellularCholangiocarcinomaDrinkingFemaleHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedSex FactorsUnited StatesCaffeineCoffee

Identifiers

PMID26126626
PMCPMC4576990
OpenAlexW1930304479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.